Skip to content

chore: fix some minor issues in comments #117

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
stellrust wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: fix some minor issues in comments #117

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions incidents/riseup-for-adi.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ At the same time I have watched osmosis flourish.

The osmosis validator set is capable of code reviews, it is highly participatory, and participation is rewarded with delegations not only by the foundation, but also and maybe even more importantly, with recognition. The team routinely tweets out hey maybe you should delegate to these excellent validators, because they.... (Various confirmable actions)

The osmosis validator set is treated as a part of the team. There's no way to look at the situation with the ICF and say that that is the case for the Cosmos hub.
The osmosis validator set is treated as a part of the team. There's no way to look at the situation with the ICF and say that is the case for the Cosmos hub.

You guys are going to need to put together a full revolution in how you deal with the hubs community. Because right now what you've got is a very clear situation where unfortunately the team, mainly composed of individuals working for IG and informal, thinks that the validator set is somehow separate from the code base. But we aren't, unless of course you really and truly think validators should not be doing code reviews and you know, checking stuff, to make sure that it is valid.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ My saying that should not cause a small horde of people who are ultimately paid

## Advice

Look I'm a person who has failed a lot. I have failed at various and sundry things and succeeded in a couple of things which is fairly normal for entrepreneurs. Bucky ICF is not going well for you. I see in your commentary online, the exact things that are causing the ICF to have problems. Like why is the ICF having difficulty? Well, you have created a bit of a buck passing culture. The people who are fighting against that buck passing culture inside of IG, I don't feel that they're getting the necessary support and I feel that that is ultimately what caused the recent difficulties surrounding the choice of SDK used by CW.
Look I'm a person who has failed a lot. I have failed at various and sundry things and succeeded in a couple of things which is fairly normal for entrepreneurs. Bucky ICF is not going well for you. I see in your commentary online, the exact things that are causing the ICF to have problems. Like why is the ICF having difficulty? Well, you have created a bit of a buck passing culture. The people who are fighting against that buck passing culture inside of IG, I don't feel that they're getting the necessary support and I feel that is ultimately what caused the recent difficulties surrounding the choice of SDK used by CW.

CW in my opinion, should rightly be merged into the main line SDK. Doesn't really matter to me whether that's the osmosis SDK or the cosmos SDK but commercial interests are without a doubt going to pull me to whichever SDK is most closely bound to CW itself because it's just that compelling and it does deserve support. My nightmare scenario is where I look around and I watch myself and colleagues invest time and energy and money only to be stopped by the negative political environment that you have created inside the ICF.

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion relaying/Readme.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ In any event, it is a very good idea to make sure that you're using NVMe drives,
* 128gb RAM
* PCIe Gen4x4 lanes storage (No RAID!)
* [Teamgroup a440](https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/teamgroup-a440-pro-ps5-4tb-pcie-4-m-2-nvme-review,2.html)
* Samsung 980 Pro <- recommended for reliablity and availability. we use these on-site.
* Samsung 980 Pro <- recommended for reliability and availability. we use these on-site.
* WD SN850 Black <- Very fast
* Optane P5800x <- fastest and most expensive
* Seagate Firecuda 530 <- Supposedly fastest but untested. Comes in a 4gb model.
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions swe/starport.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Starport

We built our software engineering practice on starport and are very grateful. Lately, dx has taken a turn for the much worse and it is all spm. Here's what I do to ship chains that I beleive in using starport:
We built our software engineering practice on starport and are very grateful. Lately, dx has taken a turn for the much worse and it is all spm. Here's what I do to ship chains that I believe in using starport:

Let's use chiuaua as an example. Arf!

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -339,6 +339,6 @@ git push

## Conclusion

In order to improve developer experience and ensure that debugging is possible down the line, Starport, the premier scaffolding tool in cosmos, should more carefully keep verisons up to date and unless spm gets 0-day updates, likely remove spm from the scaffold so that chains built with starport are easier to manage.
In order to improve developer experience and ensure that debugging is possible down the line, Starport, the premier scaffolding tool in cosmos, should more carefully keep versions up to date and unless spm gets 0-day updates, likely remove spm from the scaffold so that chains built with starport are easier to manage.