Skip to content

Conversation

@cthulhu-rider
Copy link
Contributor

@evgeniiz321 try this pls

Omission of 12162f6.

Previously, attempt to create "big" object through SN outside EC
container led to the following error:
```
status: code = 1024 message = missing EC part info in signed object
```

It happened on attempt to save produced LINK object which has no EC
attributes (part info).

Fixes #3658.

Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <[email protected]>
@cthulhu-rider cthulhu-rider force-pushed the bugfix/3658-ec-put-complex branch from 0745440 to aa8c12f Compare October 29, 2025 11:35
@cthulhu-rider cthulhu-rider marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 11:35
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 27.38%. Comparing base (18190e2) to head (aa8c12f).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3660   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.38%   27.38%           
=======================================
  Files         656      656           
  Lines       41189    41189           
=======================================
+ Hits        11278    11279    +1     
+ Misses      28853    28852    -1     
  Partials     1058     1058           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@cthulhu-rider cthulhu-rider added this to the v0.50.0 milestone Oct 30, 2025
@carpawell carpawell merged commit a540241 into master Oct 30, 2025
19 of 21 checks passed
@carpawell carpawell deleted the bugfix/3658-ec-put-complex branch October 30, 2025 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants