Fix QUERY_ACCOUNT_WITH_TOKEN: token arg type is TokenId, not UInt64#5
Merged
Conversation
The Mina daemon's `account(token:)` field has always expected a TokenId scalar, but the SDK declared `$token: UInt64!`. Any call to client.getAccountWithToken() with a non-empty token would fail with "Argument 'token' of type 'TokenId' expected on field 'account'". Confirmed against a local lightnet daemon (compatible-latest-lightnet image). A follow-up PR adds a two-layer drift checker that would have caught this earlier. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 tasks
This was referenced May 27, 2026
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The Mina daemon's
account(token:)field has always expected aTokenIdscalar, but the SDK declared\$token: UInt64!. Any call toclient.getAccountWithToken()with a non-empty token would fail with:Confirmed against a local
o1labs/mina-local-network:compatible-latest-lightnetdaemon.A follow-up PR (stacked on this branch) adds a two-layer drift-check script that would have caught this.
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code