Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement multiple File uploading #9814

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DonXavierdev
Copy link
Contributor

@DonXavierdev DonXavierdev commented Jan 7, 2025

Proposed Changes

@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added ability to combine multiple image files into a single PDF during upload
    • Introduced PDF generation functionality for file uploads
  • Dependencies

    • Added jspdf library for PDF creation
    • Updated input-otp library version

@DonXavierdev DonXavierdev requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 06:57
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces an enhancement to the file upload functionality by enabling multi-file support. A new generatePDF function is added to the useFileUpload hook, which allows multiple image files to be combined into a single PDF file during the upload process. This change simplifies the document upload workflow by automatically merging multiple files, addressing the current limitation of uploading individual pages separately.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx Added generatePDF method to convert multiple image files into a single PDF
package.json Added jspdf dependency (v^2.5.2) and adjusted input-otp version

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant FileUploadHook
    participant jsPDF
    participant FileReader

    User->>FileUploadHook: Select multiple files
    FileUploadHook->>FileReader: Read image files
    FileReader-->>FileUploadHook: Image data URLs
    FileUploadHook->>jsPDF: Generate PDF
    jsPDF-->>FileUploadHook: PDF File
    FileUploadHook->>User: Upload single PDF
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Multi-file upload support [#7417]
Automatic PDF generation
Simplify document upload for non-tech-savvy users

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, upload with glee,
Images dance, now PDF-free!
No more pages scattered wide,
One file now, with rabbit pride! 📄✨
Merging docs has never been so neat! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Deploy Preview for care-ohc failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5141210
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/care-ohc/deploys/6786096dbf6d70000833d22b

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Deploy-Failed Deplyment is not showing preview label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx (1)

Line range hint 132-146: Optimize image compression workflow

The current implementation compresses images after adding them to state, which could cause multiple re-renders. Consider compressing before updating state.

 const onFileChange = (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>): any => {
   if (!e.target.files?.length) {
     return;
   }
   const selectedFiles = Array.from(e.target.files);
-  setFiles((prev) => [...prev, ...selectedFiles]);
+  
+  const processFiles = async () => {
+    const processedFiles = await Promise.all(
+      selectedFiles.map(async (file) => {
+        const ext = file.name.split(".")[1];
+        if (ExtImage.includes(ext)) {
+          const options = {
+            initialQuality: 0.6,
+            alwaysKeepResolution: true,
+          };
+          return imageCompression(file, options);
+        }
+        return file;
+      })
+    );
+    setFiles((prev) => [...prev, ...processedFiles]);
+  };
 
-  selectedFiles.forEach((file) => {
-    const ext: string = file.name.split(".")[1];
-    if (ExtImage.includes(ext)) {
-      const options = {
-        initialQuality: 0.6,
-        alwaysKeepResolution: true,
-      };
-      imageCompression(file, options).then((compressedFile: File) => {
-        setFiles((prev) =>
-          prev.map((f) => (f.name === file.name ? compressedFile : f)),
-        );
-      });
-    }
-  });
+  processFiles();
 };
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Cypress Tests

[error] Failed to resolve import "jspdf". The module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external or properly installed.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deploy Care Fe

[error] Failed to resolve import 'jspdf'. Module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6b2596 and fbbd353.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/pages/Encounters/tabs/EncounterFilesTab.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Cypress Tests
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx

[error] Failed to resolve import "jspdf". The module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external or properly installed.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deploy Care Fe
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx

[error] Failed to resolve import 'jspdf'. Module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pages/Encounters/tabs/EncounterFilesTab.tsx (1)

139-139: LGTM! Multiple file upload configuration is correctly implemented.

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
import { useMutation, useQueryClient } from "@tanstack/react-query";
import imageCompression from "browser-image-compression";
import { t } from "i18next";
import jsPDF from "jspdf";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add jspdf to build configuration

The jspdf import is causing pipeline failures. Add it to build.rollupOptions.external.

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if jspdf is properly configured in the build setup
fd -e js -e ts "vite.config" -x cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "rollupOptions"
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Cypress Tests

[error] Failed to resolve import "jspdf". The module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external or properly installed.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deploy Care Fe

[error] Failed to resolve import 'jspdf'. Module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external

Comment on lines 269 to 279
let filesToUpload = files;

if (files.length > 1) {
const pdfFile = await generatePDF(files);
if (pdfFile) {
filesToUpload = [pdfFile];
} else {
console.error("Failed to generate PDF from multiple files.");
return;
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling and user feedback for multiple file uploads

The multiple file upload implementation needs better error handling and user feedback:

  1. No progress indication during PDF generation
  2. Silent failure if PDF generation fails
  3. Missing size limit checks for multiple files

Apply this enhancement:

 let filesToUpload = files;

 if (files.length > 1) {
+  const totalSize = files.reduce((sum, file) => sum + file.size, 0);
+  const MAX_TOTAL_SIZE = 50 * 1024 * 1024; // 50MB
+  if (totalSize > MAX_TOTAL_SIZE) {
+    setError(t("file_error__total_size"));
+    return;
+  }
+  setProgress(0);
   const pdfFile = await generatePDF(files);
   if (pdfFile) {
     filesToUpload = [pdfFile];
   } else {
-    console.error("Failed to generate PDF from multiple files.");
+    setError(t("file_error__pdf_generation"));
+    setProgress(null);
     return;
   }
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Cypress Tests

[error] Failed to resolve import "jspdf". The module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external or properly installed.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deploy Care Fe

[error] Failed to resolve import 'jspdf'. Module needs to be added to build.rollupOptions.external

Comment on lines 547 to 552
{fileUpload.files?.map((file, index) => (
<div key={index} className="flex items-center mb-2">
<CareIcon icon="l-paperclip" className="mr-2" />
{file.name}
</div>
))}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance multiple file upload UI/UX

The current UI for multiple files has several limitations:

  1. No file size information
  2. No way to remove individual files
  3. Single filename input is confusing for multiple files

Consider this enhanced implementation:

-{fileUpload.files?.map((file, index) => (
-  <div key={index} className="flex items-center mb-2">
-    <CareIcon icon="l-paperclip" className="mr-2" />
-    {file.name}
-  </div>
-))}
+{fileUpload.files?.map((file, index) => (
+  <div key={index} className="flex items-center justify-between mb-2 bg-white p-2 rounded">
+    <div className="flex items-center">
+      <CareIcon icon="l-paperclip" className="mr-2" />
+      <div className="flex flex-col">
+        <span className="text-sm font-medium">{file.name}</span>
+        <span className="text-xs text-gray-500">
+          {(file.size / 1024).toFixed(1)}KB
+        </span>
+      </div>
+    </div>
+    <button
+      onClick={() => fileUpload.removeFile(index)}
+      className="text-gray-500 hover:text-red-500"
+    >
+      <CareIcon icon="l-times" />
+    </button>
+  </div>
+))}

Also consider updating the filename input field to handle multiple files:

-<TextFormField
-  name="consultation_file"
-  type="text"
-  label={t("enter_file_name")}
-  id="upload-file-name"
-  required
-  value={fileUpload.fileNames[0] || ""}
-  disabled={fileUpload.uploading}
-  onChange={(e) => fileUpload.setFileName(e.value)}
-  error={fileUpload.error || undefined}
-/>
+{fileUpload.files.map((file, index) => (
+  <TextFormField
+    key={index}
+    name={`file_name_${index}`}
+    type="text"
+    label={t("enter_file_name_for", { name: file.name })}
+    id={`upload-file-name-${index}`}
+    required
+    value={fileUpload.fileNames[index] || ""}
+    disabled={fileUpload.uploading}
+    onChange={(e) => fileUpload.setFileName(e.value, index)}
+    error={fileUpload.error || undefined}
+  />
+))}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

104-104: Consider browser-side PDF generation performance impact

Since PDF generation will happen in the browser, consider implementing the following optimizations:

  1. Add a loading state during PDF generation
  2. Use the existing browser-image-compression library to optimize images before PDF generation
  3. Consider implementing lazy loading if handling large numbers of images
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fbbd353 and f136465.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test
  • GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
  • GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL-Build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

104-104: Verify jspdf version and security advisories

The addition of jspdf for PDF generation is appropriate. However, let's verify the version and check for any security advisories.

Run the following script to check the latest version and security advisories:

✅ Verification successful

✓ jspdf dependency version and security verified

The specified version ^2.5.2 is the latest available and is free from known security vulnerabilities. All previously reported issues were patched in earlier versions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories and latest versions of the jspdf library

# Check NPM for latest versions
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/jspdf | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest'

# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "jspdf") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 1036

@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge conflict pull requests with merge conflict label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

👋 Hi, @DonXavierdev,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.


This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge conflict pull requests with merge conflict label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Jacobjeevan Jacobjeevan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't test this yet due to permissions being restricted with encounters (and patient files isn't merged yet), so will wait till then.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should only be adding jspdf 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even if i remove other dependencies like atob,canvg etc. When user installs using "npm install" jspdf automatically installs the necessary dependencies into the package-lock.json file. What should i do about it. @Jacobjeevan

Copy link
Contributor

@Jacobjeevan Jacobjeevan Jan 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even if i remove other dependencies like atob,canvg etc. When user installs using "npm install" jspdf automatically installs the necessary dependencies into the package-lock.json file. What should i do about it. @Jacobjeevan

Then it's fine (to include them) 👍 Make sure only those are affected though.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not relevant to the issue 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here.

@@ -238,8 +266,19 @@ export default function useFileUpload(
if (!validateFileUpload()) return;

setProgress(0);
let filesToUpload = files;

if (files.length > 1) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, right now it would combine any multi-uploads, let's not do that..instead let's add an option on FE (similar to "Upload From Device, Open Camera" etc) to trigger this.

@Jacobjeevan Jacobjeevan added the waiting for related PR a co-related detail PR is under construction label Jan 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

104-104: Consider performance implications of PDF generation

Since this library will be used for merging multiple images into a PDF:

  1. Consider implementing a maximum file size limit
  2. Add client-side image compression before PDF generation
  3. Consider showing a loading indicator during PDF generation
  4. Test with various image formats (JPEG, PNG, etc.) and sizes

The existing browser-image-compression dependency (line 40) could be utilized for image optimization before PDF generation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c20535 and 5fe1f64.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - care-ohc
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - care-ohc
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - care-ohc
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

104-104: Verify jspdf version and compatibility

Please verify the jspdf version and any known issues:

✅ Verification successful

✅ jspdf version is appropriate and secure

The specified version (^2.5.2) is the latest available and has no known security vulnerabilities. All previously reported issues were patched in earlier versions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version and security advisories for jspdf

# Get latest version from npm
echo "Latest version from npm:"
npm view jspdf version

# Check for security advisories
echo -e "\nSecurity advisories:"
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "jspdf") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 1103

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx (2)

4-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

Enhance PDF generation robustness and error handling

The PDF generation implementation needs improvements in several areas:

  1. No validation of file types before processing
  2. Hard-coded image dimensions (190, 0) may cause image distortion
  3. No progress indication during PDF generation
  4. Basic error handling without specific error messages

Previous review suggestions for improving the implementation are still valid. Additionally:

  1. Add file type validation before processing
  2. Consider memory usage for large files
  3. Add progress indication during PDF generation
  4. Improve error handling with specific error messages

Also applies to: 101-127


265-275: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve error handling and user feedback for multiple file uploads

The multiple file upload implementation needs better error handling and user feedback:

  1. No size limit checks for multiple files
  2. Silent failure if PDF generation fails
  3. No progress indication during PDF generation

Previous review suggestions for improving error handling and user feedback are still valid.

src/pages/Encounters/tabs/EncounterFilesTab.tsx (1)

547-552: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance multiple file upload UI/UX

The current UI for multiple files has several limitations:

  1. No file size information
  2. No way to remove individual files
  3. Single filename input is confusing for multiple files

Previous review suggestions for improving the UI/UX are still valid.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5fe1f64 and 5d65539.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/pages/Encounters/tabs/EncounterFilesTab.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test
  • GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)

@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ export const EncounterFilesTab = (props: EncounterTabProps) => {
],
allowNameFallback: false,
onUpload: () => refetch(),
multiple: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Revise the automatic PDF generation approach

As per previous feedback from Jacobjeevan, automatically combining all multi-uploads into a PDF is not the desired behavior. Instead, consider adding a separate UI option to trigger PDF generation.

Consider adding a new option in the file upload dropdown menu:

 <DropdownMenuContent
   align="end"
   className="w-[calc(100vw-2.5rem)] sm:w-full"
 >
+  <DropdownMenuItem className="flex flex-row items-center text-primary-900">
+    <button
+      onClick={() => handleCombineIntoPDF()}
+      className="flex flex-row items-center"
+    >
+      <CareIcon icon="l-file-pdf" className="mr-1" />
+      <span>{t("combine_as_pdf")}</span>
+    </button>
+  </DropdownMenuItem>

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@DonXavierdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Accidently Clicked on re-review.

> Should only be adding jspdf 👍

Can you please respond to this reply .
Also Will be adding this ASAP

> Hmm, right now it would combine any multi-uploads, let's not do that..instead let's add an option on FE (similar to "Upload From Device, Open Camera" etc) to trigger this

@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge conflict pull requests with merge conflict label Jan 13, 2025
Copy link

👋 Hi, @DonXavierdev,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.


This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx (1)

101-127: Revise the multi-file upload approach

As per the reviewer's feedback, instead of automatically combining all multi-uploads into a PDF, add a specific UI option (similar to "Upload From Device" or "Open Camera") to trigger this functionality. This will give users more control over when to combine files into a PDF.

Consider these changes:

  1. Add a new prop to control PDF generation: combineToPDF?: boolean
  2. Only trigger PDF generation when this prop is true
  3. Add a new UI button/option specifically for PDF upload
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 101-101: 'generatePDF' is assigned a value but never used. Allowed unused vars must match /^_/u.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da64eb4 and 5141210.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx

[error] 101-101: 'generatePDF' is assigned a value but never used. Allowed unused vars must match /^_/u.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)

🪛 GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx

[failure] 284-284:
Cannot find name 'filesToUpload'.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Cypress Tests
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx

[error] 284-284: TypeScript error: Cannot find name 'filesToUpload'

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deploy Care Fe
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx

[error] 284-284: Cannot find name 'filesToUpload'. TypeScript compilation error

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL-Build
  • GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
  • GitHub Check: lint
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/hooks/useFileUpload.tsx (3)

4-4: Add jspdf to build configuration

The jspdf import is causing pipeline failures. Add it to build.rollupOptions.external.


101-127: Enhance PDF generation robustness and quality

The PDF generation implementation needs several critical improvements:

  1. No validation of image types before processing
  2. Hard-coded image dimensions (190, 0) may cause distortion
  3. Missing progress indication during PDF generation
  4. Basic error handling with console.log
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 101-101: 'generatePDF' is assigned a value but never used. Allowed unused vars must match /^_/u.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


284-284: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix undefined variable and implement multi-file handling

The code uses an undefined variable filesToUpload. This is causing TypeScript compilation errors and will fail at runtime.

Add the following code before the for loop to handle multiple files:

+    let filesToUpload = files;
+    if (files.length > 1) {
+      const pdfFile = await generatePDF(files);
+      if (pdfFile) {
+        filesToUpload = [pdfFile];
+      } else {
+        setError(t("file_error__pdf_generation"));
+        return;
+      }
+    }
+
     for (const [index, file] of filesToUpload.entries()) {

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)

[failure] 284-284:
Cannot find name 'filesToUpload'.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Cypress Tests

[error] 284-284: TypeScript error: Cannot find name 'filesToUpload'

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deploy Care Fe

[error] 284-284: Cannot find name 'filesToUpload'. TypeScript compilation error

Comment on lines +101 to +127
const generatePDF = async (files: File[]): Promise<File | null> => {
try {
const pdf = new jsPDF();
for (const [index, file] of files.entries()) {
const imgData = await new Promise<string>((resolve, reject) => {
const reader = new FileReader();
reader.onload = () => resolve(reader.result as string);
reader.onerror = () => reject("Error reading file");
reader.readAsDataURL(file);
});

pdf.addImage(imgData, "JPEG", 10, 10, 190, 0);
if (index < files.length - 1) pdf.addPage();
}

const pdfBlob = pdf.output("blob");
const pdfFile = new File([pdfBlob], "combined.pdf", {
type: "application/pdf",
});

console.log("Generated PDF file:", pdfFile); // Log the generated file
return pdfFile;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error generating PDF:", error);
return null;
}
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Add image type validation before PDF generation

The current implementation doesn't validate file types before attempting PDF generation, which could lead to errors when processing non-image files. Add a check using the supported image MIME types:

const isImageFile = (file: File) => {
  const imageTypes = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/gif', 'image/webp'];
  return imageTypes.includes(file.type);
};

// In generatePDF function
if (!files.every(isImageFile)) {
  console.error("Non-image files detected");
  return null;
}
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify file types before PDF generation

Ensure that PDF generation is only attempted with image files. Let's verify the current file type handling:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how file types are handled across the codebase
echo "Searching for file type checks..."
rg -A 5 "file.type" --type ts --type tsx

echo "Searching for image type constants..."
rg -A 5 "ExtImage" --type ts --type tsx

echo "Searching for PDF-related code..."
rg -A 5 "pdf" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 438


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for file type checks and image-related code
echo "Searching for file type validations..."
rg "file\.type|fileType" -A 5

echo "Searching for image type checks..."
rg "image/(jpeg|png|gif|webp)" -A 5

echo "Searching for PDF generation context..."
rg "generatePDF|jsPDF" -A 5

Length of output: 8680

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 101-101: 'generatePDF' is assigned a value but never used. Allowed unused vars must match /^_/u.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge conflict pull requests with merge conflict label Jan 14, 2025
@bodhish bodhish requested a review from gigincg January 14, 2025 07:23
@Jacobjeevan Jacobjeevan removed the waiting for related PR a co-related detail PR is under construction label Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changes required Deploy-Failed Deplyment is not showing preview
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

File Upload enhancement- multi-file support
3 participants