update SDK usage examples

[nozim]

Description

Update examples folder with running examples.

---

For contributor use:

• Targeted PR against master branch
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the standards mentioned here.
• Updated relevant documentation
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• Added appropriate labels

[devbugging]

I believe you forgot to mod tidy @nozim

[nozim]

@sideninja updated, thanks 😊

[devbugging]

And make sure to regenerate mocks, it looks like that is failing.

[nozim]

yes, also there is another failing example. Will fix in a bit. Thanks

[devbugging]

@chasefleming mind reviewing?

[nozim]

@sideninja @chasefleming updated deps and mocks here fc7a435.
Kindly help to review and re run the ci 🙏

[chasefleming]

@nozim rerunning

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.90% ⚠️

Comparison is base (07814fe) 62.03% compared to head (c8696ba) 61.14%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #447      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.03%   61.14%   -0.90%     
==========================================
  Files          25       26       +1     
  Lines        3003     3258     +255     
==========================================
+ Hits         1863     1992     +129     
- Misses       1016     1099      +83     
- Partials      124      167      +43     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	61.14% <ø> (-0.90%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
access/grpc/client.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
access/grpc/grpc.go	79.36% <ø> (ø)
access/http/http.go	72.77% <ø> (ø)
access/http/mock_handler.go	50.58% <ø> (ø)
crypto/awskms/awskms.go	17.07% <ø> (ø)
crypto/awskms/signer.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
crypto/cloudkms/signer.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
event.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
templates/accounts.go	18.46% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nozim]

@chasefleming awesome. thanks for help.

[nozim]

@chasefleming @sideninja kindly help to review. This should be last one :)

[nozim]

@nvdtf @chasefleming kindly help to re-review and merge if all good 🙏

[chasefleming]

@nozim Is there an issue to link to? It's a little unclear about what I should be reviewing for.

[nozim]

@chasefleming there is no particular issue for this PR. It's rather update of all the examples because they were outdated and did not compile.

[nozim]

@sideninja @nvdtf kindly help to review and merge if there is no other comments. Thanks