Skip to content

Conversation

@ashman-p
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2121

  • Does this PR change the input/output behaviour of a cryptographic algorithm (i.e., does it change known answer test values)? (If so, a version bump will be required from x.y.z to x.(y+1).0.)
  • Does this PR change the list of algorithms available -- either adding, removing, or renaming? Does this PR otherwise change an API? (If so, PRs in fully supported downstream projects dependent on these, i.e., oqs-provider will also need to be ready for review and merge by the time this is merged. Also, make sure to update the list of algorithms in the continuous benchmarking files: .github/workflows/kem-bench.yml and sig-bench.yml)

@ashman-p ashman-p self-assigned this Oct 30, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 30, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 83.588% (+0.001%) from 83.587%
when pulling f56e897 on ash_missing_lms_parms
into 46e2719 on main.

@ashman-p ashman-p marked this pull request as draft October 30, 2025 14:50
@ashman-p ashman-p marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2025 02:29
Copy link
Member

@baentsch baentsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this update @ashman-p -- beyond the functional fixes, can I assume the goal of this PR also is to reduce testing runtime? Please see single comments.

@ashman-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

ashman-p commented Nov 3, 2025

Correct. After the fix to enable the additional variants CI experienced timeouts.

@ashman-p ashman-p requested review from cothan and xuganyu96 November 5, 2025 15:47
Copy link
Contributor

@xuganyu96 xuganyu96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made a few cosmetic suggestions. Will approve once I finish running the test suites myself.

@ashman-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

ashman-p commented Nov 6, 2025

Made a few cosmetic suggestions. Will approve once I finish running the test suites myself.

Thanks for reviewing.

@ashman-p ashman-p closed this Nov 6, 2025
@ashman-p ashman-p reopened this Nov 6, 2025
@ashman-p ashman-p force-pushed the ash_missing_lms_parms branch from 3c3ba64 to 60bd9ac Compare November 6, 2025 01:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Many LMS variants disabled with -DOQS_ENABLE_SIG_STFL_LMS=ON

5 participants