Skip to content

Move public WorkflowSpec input(Map<String, Object> input) { to experimental module #1328

Description

@mathecruz

That should go on the experimental java side (another PR), this is covering the standard spec part

Originally posted by @fjtirado in #1213 (comment)

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Move ` public WorkflowSpec input(Map<String, Object> input) {` to experimental module[/-] [+]Move `public WorkflowSpec input(Map<String, Object> input) {` to experimental module[/+] on Apr 20, 2026
  2. fjtirado commented on Apr 21, 2026

    @fjtirado
    Collaborator

    After a second though, this one https://github.com/serverlessworkflow/sdk-java/blob/main/fluent/spec/src/main/java/io/serverlessworkflow/fluent/spec/dsl/WorkflowSpec.java#L45-L48 seems fine to me in the standard fluent.
    what we should avoid in the standard fluent are things not supported by the standard spec, like java functions, but using a Map here to populate the subflow input is standard

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions