Add memory policy support #4726
Conversation
askervin
force-pushed
the
5aD-oci-mempolicy
branch
10 times, most recently
from
66df434 to
cde25df
Compare
askervin
changed the title
|
@AkihiroSuda, @giuseppe, do you think it would be good to keep this PR as Draft until opencontainers/runtime-spec#1282 is merged? Or should I make it Ready for review (despite the "replace" in go.mod) in order to get reviews and possibly get this tagged into v1.3? |
|
Please keep this draft until the runtime spec PR gets merged |
askervin
force-pushed
the
5aD-oci-mempolicy
branch
4 times, most recently
from
26ab8a1 to
3bb9611
Compare
askervin
force-pushed
the
5aD-oci-mempolicy
branch
2 times, most recently
from
22c31a6 to
e5dca5d
Compare
|
@AkihiroSuda, as the memory policy field is now in place in the runtime-spec (opencontainers/runtime-spec#1282 merged), I updated this PR to use the latest runtime-spec and removed the Draft status. Rebased and fixed lint issues. Good for review now. :) |
|
Careful with the milestones. According to the new release policy, features should by merged by rc1, which is due by the end of the month. |
askervin
force-pushed
the
5aD-oci-mempolicy
branch
from
e5dca5d to
c0e7e4e
Compare
|
This is marked for 1.4.0 but I plan to cut -rc1 this week and there are still some outstanding points. Do we want to merge this as-is and fix it in -rc2 or punt it for 1.5.0 (to be released in April 2026)? |
|
IMHO let's continue with the plans to release rc.1. If this is ready before that, we include it, otherwise we then decide if we want to merge and polish during the rc phase or just wait for 1.5. |
askervin
force-pushed
the
5aD-oci-mempolicy
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b58fe51 to
bed8a2c
Compare
Implement support for Linux memory policy in OCI spec PR: opencontainers/runtime-spec#1282 Signed-off-by: Antti Kervinen <[email protected]>
askervin
force-pushed
the
5aD-oci-mempolicy
branch
from
bed8a2c to
b9d49e6
Compare
Implement support for Linux memory policy in OCI spec PR: opencontainers/runtime-spec#1282