Skip to content

8351167: ZGC: Lazily initialize livemap #23907

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jsikstro
Copy link
Member

@jsikstro jsikstro commented Mar 4, 2025

Memory for the bitmap inside the livemap of a ZPage is currently allocated upon calling its constructor, which adds a latency overhead when allocating pages. As preparation for the Mapped Cache (JDK-8350441), but also as a standalone improvement, we want to instead lazily initialize the livemap's bitmap.

This patch holds off with allocating memory for the bitmap that the livemap uses until the livemap is written to the first time (i.e. by calling ZLiveMap::set). The effect of this is that the latency impact of allocating the bitmap will only be taken by GC threads and not by mutator threads, since only GC threads mark objects before pushing them onto the mark stack. This improvement will reduce page allocation latencies somewhat.

In addition to lazily allocating the bitmap, I've converted the static C-style cast to a checked cast for ZPage::object_max_count(), which is passed as the size to the bitmaps. This is because a value not contained in 32 bits will overflow with the C-style cast and give a too small bitmap when passed to the livemap. This is not an observed issue, just more of a sanity check.

Testing:

  • Tiers 1-5
  • GHA

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8351167: ZGC: Lazily initialize livemap (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23907/head:pull/23907
$ git checkout pull/23907

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23907
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23907/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23907

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23907

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23907.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 4, 2025

👋 Welcome back jsikstro! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 4, 2025

@jsikstro This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8351167: ZGC: Lazily initialize livemap

Reviewed-by: sjohanss, eosterlund, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 98 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4be502e: 8350642: Interpreter: Upgrade CountBytecodes to 64 bit on 64 bit platforms
  • 1fe4526: 8350194: Last 2 parameters of ReturnNode::ReturnNode are swapped in the declaration
  • 1d147cc: 8351484: Race condition in max stats in MonitorList::add
  • 4412c07: 8351639: Improve debuggability of test/langtools/jdk/jshell/JdiHangingListenExecutionControlTest.java test
  • 1dd9cf1: 8349099: java/awt/Headless/HeadlessMalfunctionTest.java fails on CI with Compilation error
  • 64464ea: 8351673: Clean up a case of if (LockingMode == LM_LIGHTWEIGHT) in a legacy-only locking mode function
  • 9a49418: 8345940: Migrate security-related resources from Java classes to properties files
  • e71f327: 8351045: ClassValue::remove cannot ensure computation observes up-to-date state
  • cef3693: 8351656: Problemlist gc/TestAllocHumongousFragment#generational
  • da2b4f0: 8351606: Use build_platform for graphviz dependency
  • ... and 88 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8073914af7d4ddd7bbd93d75104c7637e38a7ad9...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 4, 2025

@jsikstro The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@kstefanj kstefanj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable.

@jsikstro
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for the reviews!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Going to push as commit 2672c40.
Since your change was applied there have been 147 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 17, 2025

@jsikstro Pushed as commit 2672c40.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jsikstro jsikstro deleted the JDK-8351167 branch April 9, 2025 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants