-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8350460: org.openjdk.bench.vm.floatingpoint.DremFrem JMH fails with -ea #23917
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
👋 Welcome back ecaspole! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@ericcaspole This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details. |
@ericcaspole To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command. Applicable Labels
|
/label core-libs compiler |
@ericcaspole The |
Webrevs
|
@ericcaspole Do you mean hotspot-compiler for the label instead of javac? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These benchmarks are malformed indeed; the blackhole is never used.
Also might need to add an 2025 copyright header for this file. |
Thanks @liach I removed the unused Blackhole and updated the copyright header. |
The normal SQE process runs all the repo JMH with -ea to get the last bit of extra testing. This DremFrem JMH contained some asserts that would always fire on the correct answer, disturbing this normal SQE process. I removed a lot more asserts from this JMH which seemed to make it more of a SQE test than a benchmark. We would prefer to keep benchmarks as benchmarks as much as possible and not creep into tests.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23917/head:pull/23917
$ git checkout pull/23917
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23917
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23917/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23917
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23917
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23917.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment