-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8358701: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP #25670
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 75 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@kevinjwalls The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
/csr |
@AlanBateman has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request. @kevinjwalls please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8358701 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved. |
src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/remote/package-info.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
While updating, I now see this as problematic: Updating: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good
Thanks Daniel and Alan - I have created the CSR. |
src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/remote/package-info.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 66535fe.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 66535fe. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
/backport :jdk25 |
@kevinjwalls the backport was successfully created on the branch backport-kevinjwalls-66535fe2-jdk25 in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk:jdk25, just click the following link: The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:
If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk:
|
Doc-only cleanup, not part of the API/spec.
Remove link to the very old reference implementation of JMXMP in the Javadoc. This may misleadingly imply it is a supported part of the JDK.
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25670/head:pull/25670
$ git checkout pull/25670
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25670
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25670/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25670
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25670
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25670.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment