8359965: Enable paired pushp and popp instruction usage for APX enabled CPUs

[vamsi-parasa]

The goal of this PR is to enhance the existing x86 assembly stubs using PUSH and POP instructions with paired PUSHP/POPP instructions which are part of Intel APX technology.

In Intel APX, the PUSHP and POPP instructions are modern, compact replacements for the legacy PUSH and POP, designed to work seamlessly with the expanded set of 32 general-purpose registers (R0–R31). Unlike their predecessors, they use the new APX (REX2-based) encoding, enabling more uniform and efficient instruction formats. These instructions improve code density, simplify register access, and are optimized for performance on APX-enabled CPUs.

Pairing PUSHP and POPP in Intel APX provides CPU-level benefits such as more efficient instruction decoding, better stack pointer tracking, and improved register dependency management. Their uniform encoding allows for streamlined execution, reduced pipeline stalls, and potential micro-op fusion, all of which enhance performance and power efficiency. This pairing helps the processor optimize speculative execution and register lifetimes, making code faster and more scalable on modern architectures.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8359965: Enable paired pushp and popp instruction usage for APX enabled CPUs (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25889/head:pull/25889
$ git checkout pull/25889

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25889
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25889/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25889

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25889

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25889.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back sparasa! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

@vamsi-parasa The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (8ea6d6ce)

[dholmes-ora]

Just a drive-by comment as this isn't code I normally have much to do with but to me it would look a lot cleaner to define push_paired/pop_paired (maybe abbreviating directly to pushp/popp?) rather than passing the boolean.