Skip to content

Conversation

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang commented Nov 18, 2025

Hi, please consider this test-only change fixing an IR test failure.

This IR test fails on platforms without native support for Float16. The reason is that method Float::floatToFloat16 is inlined into method TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegation.testHalfFloat, which causes unexpected IR graph. One way to fix this would be disabling inlining of methods from the java.lang.Float class.

After this change, we are doing CallStaticJava to convert between Float16 and Float on these platforms:

  ......
  259  CallStaticJava  === 5 6 7 8 1 (22 1 669 1 10 1 22 ) [[ 260 261 262 264 ]] # Static  java.lang.Float::float16ToFloat float ( int ) Float16::floatValue @ bci:4 (line 876) Float16::subtract @ b    ci:1 (line 1185) TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegation::testHalfFloat @ bci:9 (line 69) !jvms: Float16::floatValue @ bci:4 (line 876) Float16::subtract @ bci:1 (line 1185) TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegation:    :testHalfFloat @ bci:9 (line 69)

  ......

  562  CallStaticJava  === 553 507 538 8 1 (526 1 1 1 1 559 559 ) [[ 563 564 565 567 ]] # Static  java.lang.Float::floatToFloat16 short ( float ) Float16::valueOf @ bci:5 (line 361) Float16::subtra    ct @ bci:9 (line 1185) TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegation::testHalfFloat @ bci:12 (line 67) !jvms: Float16::valueOf @ bci:5 (line 361) Float16::subtract @ bci:9 (line 1185) TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegat    ion::testHalfFloat @ bci:12 (line 67)

  ......

Verified with fastdebug build on aarch64, x86_64 and riscv64 platforms.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8372046: compiler/floatingpoint/TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegation.java fails IR verification (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28364/head:pull/28364
$ git checkout pull/28364

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28364
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28364/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28364

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28364

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28364.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back fyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@RealFYang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8372046: compiler/floatingpoint/TestSubNodeFloatDoubleNegation.java fails IR verification

Reviewed-by: mhaessig, epeter

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 35 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@RealFYang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@RealFYang RealFYang marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 05:04
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 18, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Webrevs

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

Test was added by JDK-8351515, @mhaessig might want to have a look at this.

@mhaessig
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for looking into this, @RealFYang. The changes look good. I tested locally on x64 with and without FP16 support and just kicked off a CI run. I'll report back with the results in a few hours.

Copy link
Contributor

@mhaessig mhaessig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Testing passed.

Copy link
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 18, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates :)

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mhaessig mhaessig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good. I reran the CI and everything passed.

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member Author

@mhaessig @eme64 : Thanks for the reviews and testing.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Going to push as commit a3b1aff.
Since your change was applied there have been 44 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 20, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 20, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 20, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 20, 2025

@RealFYang Pushed as commit a3b1aff.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants