Skip to content

8332368: ubsan aarch64: immediate_aarch64.cpp:298:31: runtime error: shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' #209

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Apr 27, 2025

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit d783a940 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Boris Ulasevich on 22 Apr 2025 and was reviewed by Andrew Dinn.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8332368 needs maintainer approval

Warning

 ⚠️ Found leading lowercase letter in issue title for 8332368: ubsan aarch64: immediate_aarch64.cpp:298:31: runtime error: shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'

Issue

  • JDK-8332368: ubsan aarch64: immediate_aarch64.cpp:298:31: runtime error: shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u.git pull/209/head:pull/209
$ git checkout pull/209

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/209
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u.git pull/209/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 209

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 209

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u/pull/209.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 27, 2025

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 27, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport d783a940988677dc91975f884adeaf9f047f7e07 8332368: ubsan aarch64: immediate_aarch64.cpp:298:31: runtime error: shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' Apr 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 27, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 27, 2025

⚠️ @sendaoYan This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 27, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 27, 2025

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label May 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 13, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 25, 2025

@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

wait

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot removed the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Jun 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 4, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 22, 2025

@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

I think jdk24 is not needed to backport.

@sendaoYan sendaoYan closed this Jun 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant