Skip to content

Conversation

@Pankraz76
Copy link
Contributor

Description

[Describe what this change achieves]

Related Issues

Resolves #[Issue number to be closed when this PR is merged]

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

relates to:

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 0ecc72a: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is stalled because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot added the stalled Issues that have stalled label Sep 29, 2025
Copy link
Member

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for helping remove the dead code. Looks good mostly, can you please remove changelog and rebase.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 6c541f9: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 added skip-changelog and removed stalled Issues that have stalled labels Nov 3, 2025
@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 changed the title S1144: Unused "private" methods should be removed Remove unused "private" methods Nov 3, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for c161a3f: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for c161a3f: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Member

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, waiting for CI to go green!

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 added the non-issue bugs / unexpected behaviors that end up non issues; audit trail simple changes that aren't issues label Nov 4, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

✅ Gradle check result for c161a3f: SUCCESS

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.21%. Comparing base (db72ca2) to head (c161a3f).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #19187      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     73.09%   73.21%   +0.12%     
- Complexity    71062    71175     +113     
============================================
  Files          5754     5754              
  Lines        325260   325194      -66     
  Branches      47036    47018      -18     
============================================
+ Hits         237736   238079     +343     
+ Misses        68383    67980     -403     
+ Partials      19141    19135       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 merged commit 6b5c08a into opensearch-project:main Nov 4, 2025
44 of 52 checks passed
@sandeshkr419
Copy link
Member

Thanks @Pankraz76 for working on this! Merged!

@Pankraz76
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for catching up on this. @sandeshkr419

Without merge of maintainer any contribution seems obsolete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

non-issue bugs / unexpected behaviors that end up non issues; audit trail simple changes that aren't issues skip-changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants