-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 539
DNM: Kueue Operator API Review Part 2 #2250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hello @kannon92! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
/hold |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A handful of additional, minor, comments.
operator/v1alpha1/types_kueue.go
Outdated
type ByWorkload struct { | ||
// admission controls how Kueue will process workloads. | ||
// admission is a required field with policy is set to ByWorkload. | ||
// admission is only required if policy is specified to ByWorkload. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this implied by byWorkload
being required when policy
is set to ByWorkload
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect both this line and the line before are redundant
operator/v1alpha1/types_kueue.go
Outdated
type ByWorkload struct { | ||
// admission controls how Kueue will process workloads. | ||
// admission is a required field with policy is set to ByWorkload. | ||
// admission is only required if policy is specified to ByWorkload. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect both this line and the line before are redundant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good to me
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven, kannon92 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
LGTM |
@kannon92: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
We have got more requirements for Operator now.
Opening this up so we can discuss.
Please ignore the other API fields as these have already been approved by @JoelSpeed.