NO-ISSUE: Refresh RPM lockfiles#818
Conversation
|
@red-hat-konflux[bot]: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: red-hat-konflux[bot] The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
2 similar comments
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: red-hat-konflux[bot] The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: red-hat-konflux[bot] The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@red-hat-konflux[bot]: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
a179ad7 to
a2d84b3
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #818 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 61.74% 61.74%
=======================================
Files 27 27
Lines 1767 1767
=======================================
Hits 1091 1091
Misses 510 510
Partials 166 166 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
a2d84b3 to
d1db95b
Compare
Signed-off-by: red-hat-konflux <126015336+red-hat-konflux[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
d1db95b to
0ffabe4
Compare
WalkthroughThe PR updates the ChangesDependency Lockfile Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 11 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (11 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rpm-prefetching/rpms.lock.yaml (1)
49-55: Lockfile update is mechanically sound and consistent across all architectures.The kernel-headers package update from
5.14.0-611.42.1.el9_7to5.14.0-611.49.1.el9_7shows proper synchronization across all four supported architectures (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64). URLs, checksums, sizes, and source RPMs are updated consistently.Recommend confirming:
- Build succeeds with the updated kernel-headers (transitive dependency affecting compilation toolchain)
- Any warnings from the dependency resolution step are addressed per the PR description
Also applies to: 816-822, 1590-1596, 2364-2370
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@rpm-prefetching/rpms.lock.yaml` around lines 49 - 55, The lockfile bump for kernel-headers (evr 5.14.0-611.49.1.el9_7, sourcerpm kernel-5.14.0-611.49.1.el9_7.src.rpm) is mechanically correct but you must verify the change doesn't break downstream builds: run the full build/test for all architectures (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64) using the updated rpm-prefetching/rpms.lock.yaml entries (including the other identical blocks at the indicated ranges) and if any compilation or dependency-resolution warnings/errors appear, update dependency constraints or pin transitive toolchain packages accordingly and re-generate the lockfile entries to match resolved artifacts.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@rpm-prefetching/rpms.lock.yaml`:
- Around line 49-55: The lockfile bump for kernel-headers (evr
5.14.0-611.49.1.el9_7, sourcerpm kernel-5.14.0-611.49.1.el9_7.src.rpm) is
mechanically correct but you must verify the change doesn't break downstream
builds: run the full build/test for all architectures (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x,
x86_64) using the updated rpm-prefetching/rpms.lock.yaml entries (including the
other identical blocks at the indicated ranges) and if any compilation or
dependency-resolution warnings/errors appear, update dependency constraints or
pin transitive toolchain packages accordingly and re-generate the lockfile
entries to match resolved artifacts.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 34bbc93e-578a-448f-af29-14d7e3a566db
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rpm-prefetching/rpms.lock.yaml
|
@red-hat-konflux[bot]: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This PR contains the following updates:
🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on Saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.
To execute skipped test pipelines write comment
/ok-to-test.Documentation
Find out how to configure dependency updates in MintMaker documentation or see all available configuration options in Renovate documentation.