Skip to content

Conversation

tchap
Copy link

@tchap tchap commented Sep 8, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

kube-apiserver now logs each HTTP request twice since there is an extra logging call when finishing the request. This duplicity is now removed.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

N/A

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

N/A

kube-apiserver now logs each HTTP request twice since there is an extra
logging call when finishing the request. This duplicity is now removed.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 8, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Sep 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tchap: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43994, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

kube-apiserver now logs each HTTP request twice since there is an extra logging call when finishing the request. This duplicity is now removed.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

N/A

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

N/A

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tchap: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@tchap
Copy link
Author

tchap commented Sep 8, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tchap: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43994, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Sep 8, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tchap
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jerpeter1 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tchap
Copy link
Author

tchap commented Sep 9, 2025

/retest

2 similar comments
@tchap
Copy link
Author

tchap commented Sep 9, 2025

/retest

@tchap
Copy link
Author

tchap commented Sep 10, 2025

/retest

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@tchap: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial 10c8973 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial 10c8973 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants