Skip to content

Conversation

@qJkee
Copy link
Contributor

@qJkee qJkee commented Jan 9, 2026

Improve deletion logic for encrypted devices as user provided device name and actual device name on host usually doesnt match

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@qJkee: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-72257, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Improve deletion logic for encrypted devices as user provided device name and actual device name on host usually doesnt match

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 9, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 9, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qJkee

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 9, 2026
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 9, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 37.50000% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 48.68%. Comparing base (c070ca9) to head (ba90182).
⚠️ Report is 58 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/controllers/vgmanager/controller.go 37.50% 3 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1912      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   48.69%   48.68%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          52       52              
  Lines        3709     3716       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         1806     1809       +3     
- Misses       1753     1756       +3     
- Partials      150      151       +1     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
internal/controllers/vgmanager/controller.go 66.38% <37.50%> (-0.36%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Improve deletion logic for encrypted devices as user provided
device name and actual device name on host usually doesnt match
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 9, 2026
@qJkee
Copy link
Contributor Author

qJkee commented Jan 9, 2026

/retest

@suleymanakbas91
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 9, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 9, 2026

@qJkee: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-hypershift ba90182 link true /test e2e-aws-hypershift
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node ba90182 link true /test e2e-aws-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws ba90182 link true /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants