Skip to content

OBSDOCS-1676: Tempo-OTel Multitenancy documentation improvements #89092

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 24, 2025

@max-cx: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1676 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas [email protected]

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 24, 2025

@max-cx: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1676 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas [email protected]

Version(s): 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1676

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Feb 24, 2025

🤖 Tue Apr 22 18:48:56 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://89092--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 24, 2025

@max-cx: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1676 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Signed-off-by: Ruben Vargas [email protected]

Version(s): 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1676

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@max-cx max-cx force-pushed the OBSDOCS-1676 branch 2 times, most recently from 9cecfa2 to e860368 Compare February 24, 2025 19:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2025

@max-cx: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1676 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1676

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2025

@max-cx: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1676 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

⚠️ DO NOT MERGE! do-not-merge/hold Only a merge review is needed at this time.
⚠️ This PR is tied to a product release date, which is currently set to March 12.

Version(s): 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1676

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@max-cx max-cx marked this pull request as draft February 25, 2025 15:45
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 25, 2025
@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

Merge review now LGTM, proceeding to merge

@skopacz1 skopacz1 merged commit 05495c4 into openshift:main Apr 22, 2025
2 checks passed
@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92482

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92483

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92484

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92485

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92486

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92487

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92488

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #92489

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@skopacz1 skopacz1 removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants