Skip to content

TELCODOCS-2045 - Fix RDS content omissions and errors #89458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

aireilly
Copy link
Contributor

@aireilly aireilly commented Mar 3, 2025

Fix RDS content omissions and errors

Version(s):
enterprise-4.18

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-2045

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE review not required.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 3, 2025
@aireilly
Copy link
Contributor Author

aireilly commented Mar 3, 2025

@imiller0 can you PTAL

@aireilly aireilly changed the title Fix RDS content omissions and errors TELCODOCS-2045 - Fix RDS content omissions and errors Mar 4, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 4, 2025

@aireilly: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@aireilly
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Mar 10, 2025
@cbippley
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cbippley cbippley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@cbippley
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Mar 10, 2025
@aireilly aireilly merged commit 563174a into openshift:main Apr 22, 2025
2 checks passed
@aireilly
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.18

@aireilly
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@aireilly: new pull request created: #92434

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@aireilly: new pull request created: #92435

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.18 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants