Skip to content

MTC 1.8.6 does not support multiple migplans per namespace #91832

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

MTC 1.8.6 does not support multiple migplans per namespace #91832

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor

@anarnold97 anarnold97 commented Apr 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

JIRA

Version(s):

  • OCP 4.14 → branch/enterprise-4.14
  • OCP 4.15 → branch/enterprise-4.15
  • OCP 4.16 → branch/enterprise-4.16
  • OCP 4.17 → branch/enterprise-4.17
  • OCP 4.18 → branch/enterprise-4.18
  • OCP 4.19 → branch/enterprise-4.19

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 8, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Apr 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Thu Apr 17 10:13:00 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://91832--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/migrating_from_ocp_3_to_4/migrating-applications-3-4.html
https://91832--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/migration_toolkit_for_containers/migrating-applications-with-mtc.html

midays
midays approved these changes Apr 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@midays midays left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label mtc

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the MTC Label for all MTC PRs label Apr 16, 2025
@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 16, 2025
@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 17, 2025
shreyasiddhartha
shreyasiddhartha reviewed Apr 17, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just a small grammatical suggestion.

@xenolinux PTAL! Thanks. :)

xenolinux
xenolinux reviewed Apr 17, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shreyasiddhartha @anarnold97
For the follow-up peer review - left one comment

@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 17, 2025
@anarnold97 anarnold97 force-pushed the multiple-migplans-per-namespace branch from 956caf4 to 4864108 Compare April 17, 2025 10:05
@anarnold97 anarnold97 force-pushed the multiple-migplans-per-namespace branch from effbb70 to bcc8a32 Compare April 17, 2025 10:07
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@anarnold97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Apr 22, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added this to the Continuous Release milestone Apr 22, 2025
ShaunaDiaz
ShaunaDiaz reviewed Apr 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit 794fc07 into openshift:main Apr 22, 2025
2 checks passed
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #92464

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #92466

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #92468

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #92469

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #92471

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #92472

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xenolinux xenolinux xenolinux left review comments

@shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha left review comments

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left review comments

@midays midays midays approved these changes

Assignees

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz

Labels
branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. MTC Label for all MTC PRs peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Continuous Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@anarnold97 @ocpdocs-previewbot @shreyasiddhartha @ShaunaDiaz @openshift-cherrypick-robot @xenolinux @midays