-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Fix formatting in the Machine Config Operator certificates assembly #92605
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix formatting in the Machine Config Operator certificates assembly #92605
Conversation
🤖 Thu Apr 24 19:57:06 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
@mburke5678: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label peer-review-in-progress |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92618 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92619 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92620 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92621 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92622 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92623 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92624 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #92625 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
The list in the assembly is rendering incorrectly. See current docs.
I simply fixed the list; didn't vet the wording of the bullets.
Preview: Machine Config Operator certificates -> Purpose -- Fixed list formatting.
No QE needed.