Skip to content

[RHACS] [Docs] [4.8] [updated] ROX-30086: API docs for 4.8.0 #96314

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

agantony
Copy link
Contributor

@agantony agantony commented Jul 18, 2025

Version(s):
4.8

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ROX-30086

Link to docs preview:

SME review: NA

Additional information:

@agantony agantony added RHACS Label for RHACS related PRs that go in the rhacs-docs branch rhacs-docs-4.8 labels Jul 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 18, 2025

@agantony: This pull request references ROX-30086 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.8

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ROX-30086

Link to docs preview:

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 18, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 18, 2025

🤖 Mon Jul 21 05:40:25 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://96314--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@agantony agantony changed the title [RHACS] [Docs] ROX-30086: API docs for 4.8.0 [RHACS] [Docs] [updated] ROX-30086: API docs for 4.8.0 Jul 18, 2025
ROX30086 Image service build error fix

ROX30086 CommonObjectReference build error fix
@agantony agantony force-pushed the ROX30086-rhacs-docs-main-new-1 branch from e9b7b71 to 1e8cbef Compare July 21, 2025 05:33
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2025

@agantony: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@agantony agantony merged commit 8d34776 into openshift:rhacs-docs-main Jul 21, 2025
2 checks passed
@agantony
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@agantony: Failed to get PR patch from GitHub. This PR will need to be manually cherrypicked.

Error messagestatus code 406 not one of [200], body: {"message":"Sorry, the diff exceeded the maximum number of files (300). Consider using 'List pull requests files' API or locally cloning the repository instead.","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","field":"diff","code":"too_large"}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#list-pull-requests-files","status":"406"}

In response to this:

/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@agantony agantony changed the title [RHACS] [Docs] [updated] ROX-30086: API docs for 4.8.0 [RHACS] [Docs] [4.8] [updated] ROX-30086: API docs for 4.8.0 Jul 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. RHACS Label for RHACS related PRs that go in the rhacs-docs branch rhacs-docs-4.8 size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants