Skip to content

[enterprise-4.15] OSDOCS#15342: Release notes for 4.15.55 #96330

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2025
Merged

[enterprise-4.15] OSDOCS#15342: Release notes for 4.15.55 #96330

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2025
+28 −0

Conversation

sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor

@sr1kar99 sr1kar99 commented Jul 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-15342

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.
    N/A for z-stream RNs.

Additional information:
The errata URLs will return 404 until the go-live date of 7/23/25.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 18, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Fri Jul 25 11:52:27 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://96330--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.html

tmalove
tmalove approved these changes Jul 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
@sr1kar99 sr1kar99 force-pushed the errata-4-15 branch 2 times, most recently from 0ffbe82 to 8cb7b8d Compare July 18, 2025 19:58
@sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 18, 2025
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2025

@sr1kar99: The label(s) /remove-label peer-review-in-progress cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2025

@sr1kar99: The label(s) /remove-label peer-review-needed cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/remove-label peer-review-needed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-needed

Hi @sr1kar99! Noticed this was still stuck in the queue - I think it wouldn't let you remove the label because we deprecated the peer review labels.

Since peer review has been abrogated, please apply merge-review-needed when this PR is ready for merge.

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat removed the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 22, 2025
@sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sr1kar99 sr1kar99 force-pushed the errata-4-15 branch 2 times, most recently from 26b6436 to 474a5d3 Compare July 25, 2025 07:34
@sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 25, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 25, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux changed the title OSDOCS#15342: Release notes for 4.15.55 [enterprise-4.15] OSDOCS#15342: Release notes for 4.15.55 Jul 25, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jul 25, 2025
xenolinux
xenolinux reviewed Jul 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Only one minor comment.

Merge review LGTM

release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.adoc Outdated

* Before this update, the `must-gather` tool collected CPU-related performance data sequentially per node, leading to significantly longer collection times in larger clusters. With this release, the `must-gather` tool collects the data in parallel, resulting in a reduction in collection time. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-36371[OCPBUGS-36371])

* Before this update, cluster installations in affected versions hung due to missing API endpoint certificates. As a result, installations failed or stalled, delaying cluster setup and service deployment. With this update, the certificate issue in cluster installations in {hcp} is resolved. This fix prevents API endpoint errors and allows {rh-rhacm-first} agents to start successfully. Cluster installations now complete as expected, with a smoother setup experience. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-58506[OCPBUGS-58506])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Before this update, cluster installations in affected versions hung due to missing API endpoint certificates. As a result, installations failed or stalled, delaying cluster setup and service deployment. With this update, the certificate issue in cluster installations in {hcp} is resolved. This fix prevents API endpoint errors and allows {rh-rhacm-first} agents to start successfully. Cluster installations now complete as expected, with a smoother setup experience. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-58506[OCPBUGS-58506])
* Before this update, in {hcp}, hosted cluster installations in affected versions hung due to missing API endpoint certificates. As a result, cluster installations failed or stalled, delaying cluster setup and service deployment. With this update, the certificate issue in cluster installations in {hcp} is resolved. This fix prevents API endpoint errors and allows {rh-rhacm-first} agents to start successfully. Cluster installations now complete as expected, with a smoother setup experience. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-58506[OCPBUGS-58506])

Just one minor comment to clarify in the beginning of the bug text that it's related to clusters in HCP.

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@sr1kar99: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@xenolinux xenolinux merged commit 3461f9c into openshift:enterprise-4.15 Jul 25, 2025
2 checks passed
@xenolinux xenolinux removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Jul 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xenolinux xenolinux xenolinux left review comments

@tmalove tmalove tmalove approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.15 size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Continuous Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@sr1kar99 @ocpdocs-previewbot @jeana-redhat @xenolinux @tmalove