Skip to content

Conversation

elfiesmelfie
Copy link

Allow selecting whch branch to run the ansible playbook from

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/tcib#329

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/c32891f69dc045f5b48124e4208e6dc8

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 52m 56s
podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-test-operator FAILURE in 2h 42m 41s

@elfiesmelfie
Copy link
Author

recheck

@elfiesmelfie
Copy link
Author

recheck

tokibo tests failed

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/d9ba6c3ae99a47c2bb16d31de9220237

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 32m 14s
podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc-test-operator FAILURE in 2h 21m 15s

Copy link
Contributor

@kstrenkova kstrenkova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi! Nice looking patch. Could I ask you to add content you get from running operator-sdk generate kustomize manifests? Also, could you please update the commit message to be a bit more descriptive (why it is getting added, for example)? Thanks.

Allow selecting which branch checkout and run the ansible playbook

This allows the playbook to be be run from different branches, which
adds some flexibility:
* The playbook can live on different branches, allowing for versioning
  of the playbook/tests.
* The playbook can be tested in CI prior to merging

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/tcib#329
@elfiesmelfie elfiesmelfie force-pushed the efoley/ansibletest_git_branch branch from 12352a8 to 2601795 Compare September 17, 2025 14:19
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: elfiesmelfie
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from kstrenkova. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

@kstrenkova kstrenkova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After the commit message is updated and the related tcib change is merged, I will approve. The change itself seems to be working correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants