Restructire the POD of macros (miscallaneous) #1273
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Alex-Jordan
commented
Jul 12, 2025
Alex-Jordan
commented
Jul 12, 2025
Alex-Jordan
force-pushed
the
restructure-pod-macros-miscallaneous
branch
from
f0cad75 to
9dec652
Compare
Alex-Jordan
force-pushed
the
restructure-pod-macros-miscallaneous
branch
from
9dec652 to
48b4e86
Compare
pstaabp
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2025
Not much needed here. Just the addition of a few periods, and removal of added empty lines at the beginning of some files.
|
I think that this pull request is generally in order. There are a few files that should have a period at the end of the name section, and some empty lines added that are residual from the "discussion" comment removal. I put in a pull request to fix those. |
…eous-cleanup Suggestions for openwebwork#1273.
drgrice1
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is part of an alternative to #1244, breaking it down into smaller PRs for review.