Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FSSDK-11102] chore: replace travis-ci-tools repository #571

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

muzahidul-opti
Copy link
Contributor

@muzahidul-opti muzahidul-opti commented Jan 30, 2025

Summary

  • Remove travis staff

Test plan

  • All test cases should be passed

Issues

@muzahidul-opti muzahidul-opti changed the title chore: replace travis-ci-tools repository [FSSDK-11102] chore: replace travis-ci-tools repository Feb 4, 2025
@muzahidul-opti muzahidul-opti marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 17:20
jaeopt
jaeopt previously approved these changes Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@jaeopt jaeopt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@muzahidul-opti muzahidul-opti merged commit 64d659f into master Feb 10, 2025
2 checks passed
@muzahidul-opti muzahidul-opti deleted the muzahid/remove-travis-repo branch February 10, 2025 17:32
muzahidul-opti added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
* master:
  [FSSDK-11371] parsing holdout section from the datafile (#577)
  [FSSDK-11111] chore: update cocoapods version (#576)
  [FSSDK-11102] chore: replace travis-ci-tools repository (#571)
  ci(git-action): auto release prep for 5.1.0 (#575)
  [FSSDK-11111] chore: prepare release 5.1.0 (#574)
  [FSSDK-11036] chore: revert workflow branch to master (#572)
  [FSSDK-11036] fix: event tags support nested objects (#570)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants