docs: fix typo in recovery strategy comment

[SAY-5]

Fix 'an attack occured' -> 'an attack occurred' in selfservice/strategy/code/strategy_recovery.go.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected the spelling of a CSRF failure comment.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6c009143-5df9-48a5-bed7-560dea56a44f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b86338d and f646b1b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• selfservice/strategy/code/strategy_recovery.go

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• selfservice/strategy/code/strategy_recovery.go

Included review availability: Your plan includes up to 10 reviews per rolling hour; 9 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change corrects a spelling error in a CSRF violation comment within Strategy.Recover. No logic or control flow changed.

Changes

Comment correction

Layer / File(s)	Summary
CSRF failure comment selfservice/strategy/code/strategy_recovery.go	Corrects the spelling of “occurred” in the CSRF violation comment. Behavior remains unchanged.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to f646b

This is a localized documentation-only typo correction with no expected user or production behavior change; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: aeneasr

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description states the code change but omits the required template sections, including the checklist and further comments.	Use the repository template and complete the applicable checklist items; retain the concise change summary.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely identifies the documentation typo fix in the recovery strategy comment.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.