ci: remove unnecessary steps & cleanup

[okineadev]

No description provided.

[xhyrom]

remove all unnecessary changes - keep quotes, remove emojis.

i agree with removing gh cli installation and inlining the run step if there's only one command

[okineadev]

remove all unnecessary changes - keep quotes, remove emojis.

i agree with removing gh cli installation and inlining the run step if there's only one command

Why keep the quotes?

I'm against this, I want them to be only where they are needed

[okineadev]

Regarding emojis - I want them to be at least in the Workflow name, because then it's much easier to navigate them

[okineadev]

Personally, I use them in step names because it's easier for me to navigate, but if you stick to the emoji-free style, then it's ok

[xhyrom]

remove all unnecessary changes - keep quotes, remove emojis.
i agree with removing gh cli installation and inlining the run step if there's only one command

Why keep the quotes?

I'm against this, I want them to be only where they are needed

I would keep them everywhere for consistency.

Regarding emojis - I want them to be at least in the Workflow name, because then it's much easier to navigate them

I don't see any reason for having emojis in the workflow name; it doesn't improve navigation.

[okineadev]

I would keep them everywhere for consistency.

Then please - add them if you so want them

[okineadev]

I don't understand why you didn't do it earlier

[okineadev]

Let's better decide what to do with this PR, when you merge it, then you can add those quotes, because it is not my responsibility

---

Regarding emojis in the names of Workflows, here is a visual example of their use:

Thanks to them, it is much easier and more intuitive to understand what it does

[xhyrom]

Okay, we can keep your changes but we should also change name of the autofix.ci workflow to make it consistent with others. Any idea?

[okineadev]

Okay, we can keep your changes but we should also change name of the autofix.ci workflow to make it consistent with others. Any idea?

I see that it is written there that it must be specifically called as autofix.ci to work

There are two options:

1. Do not change its name
2. Make it so that it itself make commits on behalf of github-actions[bot] independently of autofix.ci and for transparency in general (this is what I prefer)

[xhyrom]

Okay, we can keep your changes but we should also change name of the autofix.ci workflow to make it consistent with others. Any idea?

I see that it is written there that it must be specifically called as autofix.ci to work

There are two options:

1. Do not change its name
2. Make it so that it itself make commits on behalf of github-actions[bot] independently of autofix.ci and for transparency in general (this is what I prefer)

Oh, you're right! Well we can do the second thing but probably in different pull request since it's out of scope.

[okineadev]

Okay, we can keep your changes but we should also change name of the autofix.ci workflow to make it consistent with others. Any idea?

I see that it is written there that it must be specifically called as autofix.ci to work
There are two options:

1. Do not change its name
2. Make it so that it itself make commits on behalf of github-actions[bot] independently of autofix.ci and for transparency in general (this is what I prefer)

Oh, you're right! Well we can do the second thing but probably in different pull request since it's out of scope.

Ok 👌

[xhyrom]

thanks