Skip to content

Add cycle graph test for pgr_cuthillMckeeOrdering #428

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wifiBlack
Copy link

@wifiBlack wifiBlack commented Apr 1, 2025

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • Added a new cycle graph test in pgtap/ordering/cuthillMckeeOrdering/edge_cases.pg.
  • Verified the test output using pgTAP.

Test Output

Below is the pgTAP test output for the changes:

Test Summary Report
-------------------
pgtap/ordering/cuthillMckeeOrdering/edge_cases.pg (Wstat: 0 Tests: 13 Failed: 0)
  TODO passed:   11
Files=1, Tests=13,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.01 CPU)
Result: PASS

@pgRouting/admins

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new test case that evaluates graph ordering using a cycle graph scenario, ensuring vertices are ordered as expected.
    • Updated test validation logic to align with the enhanced cycle graph scenario.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Walkthrough

This update extends the edge_cases function in the cuthillMckeeOrdering module by adding a new test case for cycle graphs. A new table, cycle_graph_table, is defined with columns representing graph edges to model a cycle of four vertices. New prepared statements (q12 and r13) retrieve cycle data and apply the pgr_cuthillMckeeOrdering function. The results from these operations are validated against expected values using the set_eq function. Additionally, the plan number has been updated from 11 to 13 to reflect the new test case.

Changes

File Change Summary
pgtap/ordering/cuthillMckeeOrdering/.../edge_cases.pg Added a cycle graph test case: defined cycle_graph_table, created prepared statements q12 & r13 for data selection and ordering, and updated the plan number from 11 to 13.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant TR as Test Runner
  participant EC as edge_cases()
  participant CGT as cycle_graph_table
  participant Q12 as Prepared Statement q12
  participant CMK as pgr_cuthillMckeeOrdering()
  participant Validator as set_eq
  
  TR->>EC: Invoke edge_cases test
  EC->>CGT: Create table and insert cycle graph data
  EC->>Q12: Execute query for cycle graph data
  Q12-->>EC: Return cycle graph data
  EC->>Validator: Validate cycle graph structure
  EC->>CMK: Run ordering via prepared statement r13
  CMK-->>EC: Return vertex ordering
  EC->>Validator: Validate vertex ordering
Loading

Poem

Oh, I'm a bunny on a coding spree,
Hopping through cycles so energetically!
Creating tables with edges in a loop,
Testing orders with each little swoop.
With carrots and code, my heart does sing—
A cycle graph joy that makes my ears zing!
🐰🥕 Happy hops in every test run!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca2579d and 0688b9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pgtap/ordering/cuthillMckeeOrdering/edge_cases.pg (2 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@wifiBlack
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 1, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@wifiBlack
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai summary

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 1, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Summary regeneration triggered.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pgtap/ordering/cuthillMckeeOrdering/edge_cases.pg (1)

203-209: Add explanation for the expected ordering.

The expected ordering (1, 4, 2, 3) is verified, but it would be helpful to add a brief comment explaining why this specific ordering is expected for a cycle graph when using the Cuthill-McKee algorithm.

RETURN QUERY
SELECT set_eq('r13', $$VALUES 
  (1, 1), -- Vertex 1 is placed first
  (2, 4), -- Vertex 4 is placed second
  (3, 2), -- Vertex 2 is placed third
  (4, 3)$$, -- Vertex 3 is placed fourth
+ -- In Cuthill-McKee ordering, after starting with vertex 1, 
+ -- it processes its neighbors in ascending order (4 comes before 2)
  'r13: Cycle graph ordering');
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca2579d and 0688b9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pgtap/ordering/cuthillMckeeOrdering/edge_cases.pg (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
pgtap/ordering/cuthillMckeeOrdering/edge_cases.pg (7)

22-22: Plan count updated correctly to match new tests.

The plan count has been increased from 11 to 13 to accommodate the new cycle graph test (2 additional test cases).


170-170: Good addition of the cycle graph test case.

Adding a cycle graph test is valuable as it tests a specific graph topology not covered by the existing test cases.


172-178: Table definition follows consistent pattern.

The cycle_graph_table definition matches the schema of other test tables in this file, which is good for consistency.


180-184: Clear data insertion with helpful comments.

The edge insertions clearly define a cycle graph (1->2->3->4->1) and the inline comments make the structure easy to understand.


186-189: Query preparation follows established pattern.

The q12 prepared statement follows the same pattern as other queries in the file, maintaining consistency.


191-198: Test validation is comprehensive.

The set_eq validation ensures that the cycle graph data matches exactly what was inserted, maintaining the integrity of the test.


199-202: Ordering function test follows established pattern.

The r13 prepared statement correctly tests the pgr_cuthillMckeeOrdering function on the cycle graph.

@cvvergara
Copy link
Member

Looks nice, just some changes are needed. we can discuss in the next show and tell.

@wifiBlack
Copy link
Author

Thank you! I’m looking forward to the discussion with you!☺️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants