Better user interface to edit reverse DNS servers (dns.revServers)

[rdwebdesign]

What does this PR aim to accomplish?

Replace the current single <textarea> with a table.
Each reverse server will be in a separate row and each field will be in a separate table cell.

A small legend will improve usability (maybe we will need to change the help text).

NOTE:

Depends on #2885 (already merged)

How does this PR accomplish the above?

Using datatables plugin and a few functions to deal with dns.revServers entries.

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

1. I have read and understood the contributors guide, as well as this entire template. I understand which branch to base my commits and Pull Requests against.
2. I have commented my proposed changes within the code and I have tested my changes.
3. I am willing to help maintain this change if there are issues with it later.
4. It is compatible with the EUPL 1.2 license
5. I have squashed any insignificant commits. (git rebase)
6. I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
7. I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
8. I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
9. I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

---

• I have read the above and my PR is ready for review. Check this box to confirm

[DL6ER]

I did test your PR and it looks really great overall. However, I see you moved this PR into draft mode again and I hope the reason is: because you are adding editing :-)

The first thing I noticed was my currently defined revServer cannot be disabled. The ideal solution would be having <input> boxes in the table and allow full-blown editing (rendering the new multi-line raw value for revServers fromt he fields on save).

[rdwebdesign]

The first thing I noticed was my currently defined revServer cannot be disabled.

This is expected... In the current state, this PR can only add and delete entries. I didn't create functions to edit fields (this checkbox is just a nice way to display true/false values).

I hope the reason is: because you are adding editing

This is in my todo list.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved.

[yubiuser]

@rdwebdesign
How is the state on this PR. Is this something you want to include/hope to finish for v6?

[rdwebdesign]

I completely forgot about it.

I will take a look again when I find some time, but this is not necessary to v6 release.
This is just an improvement and can be done later.

[DL6ER]

I agree, it'd also a nice v6.1 thing

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Existing merge conflicts have not been addressed. This PR is considered abandoned.

[rdwebdesign]

This will be addressed in the future, after v6 release.

I'm reopening the PR.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Existing merge conflicts have not been addressed. This PR is considered abandoned.

[github-actions]

Existing merge conflicts have not been addressed. This PR is considered abandoned.

[DL6ER]

We agreed on it being a v6.1 project

[PromoFaux]

@rdwebdesign what is the satus of this PR please?

[yubiuser]

A lot of users would love to see progress on this

[fhughes90]

What is the status of this?