E_{SHE}$ → E^0_{abs}

TODO.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 - [ ] **12**!!
 - [ ] 62 → 61
 - [ ] Use $E^f$ in Fig. 15 (and check discussion, especially **4**)
-- [ ] Fig. 16 $E_SHE$ → $E^0_abs$
+- [x] Fig. 16 $E_{SHE}$ → $E^0_abs$
 - [ ] Conclude & abstract & keywords
 - [x] Aknowledgements
 - [x] Clean up the bibliography, check for duplicates
@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
 - [ ] prepare a TOC
 - [ ] Research highlight
 - [ ] mark missing values in Tables
+- [ ] tries to move points as much as possible in graphs

analyses/plot_pot_matsui.py

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ def plot_corr(ax, data: pandas.DataFrame, solvent: str):
 
 subdata_wa, param_matsui_wa = prepare_data(data, data_exp, 'water')
 
-ax1.text(.72, .95, '$E_{{SHE}}$ = {:.2f} V, $f$ = {:.3f}, $\\mu$ = {:.5f} a$_0^{{-1}}$'.format(*param_matsui_wa))
+ax1.text(.72, .95, '$E_{{abs}}^0(\\text{{SHE}})$ = {:.2f} V, $f$ = {:.3f}, $\\mu$ = {:.5f} a$_0^{{-1}}$'.format(*param_matsui_wa))
 
 plot_exp_vs_matsui(ax1, subdata_wa, 'water', 'Family.P6O', 'tab:blue')
 plot_exp_vs_matsui(ax1, subdata_wa, 'water', 'Family.P5O', 'black')
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ def plot_corr(ax, data: pandas.DataFrame, solvent: str):
 
 subdata_ac, param_matsui_ac = prepare_data(data, data_exp, 'acetonitrile')
 
-ax2.text(.8, 1.18, '$E_{{SHE}}$ = {:.2f} V, $f$ = {:.3f}, $\\mu$ = {:.5f} a$_0^{{-1}}$'.format(*param_matsui_ac))
+ax2.text(.8, 1.18, '$E_{{abs}}^0(\\text{{SHE}})$ = {:.2f} V, $f$ = {:.3f}, $\\mu$ = {:.5f} a$_0^{{-1}}$'.format(*param_matsui_ac))
 
 plot_exp_vs_matsui(ax2, subdata_ac, 'acetonitrile', 'Family.P6O', 'tab:blue')
 plot_exp_vs_matsui(ax2, subdata_ac, 'acetonitrile', 'Family.P5O', 'black')

nitroxides.tex

@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ \subsection{Comparison to experiment} \label{sec:exp}
 \begin{figure}[!h]
 	\centering
 	\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{Figure16}
-	\caption{Comparison between experimental ($E^0_{rel} $ vs SHE, from Table S11) and corrected oxidation potential using the scheme of Matsui et al. \cite{matsuiDensityFunctionalTheory2013} [Eq.~\eqref{eq:matsui}, with the parameter $E_{SHE}$, $f$, and $\mu$ obtained by a least-square procedure], as computed at the $\omega$B97X-D/6-311+G(d) level in water (left) and acetonitrile (right). The dashed line is a linear regression, obtained without the DH correction. }
+	\caption{Comparison between experimental ($E^0_{rel} $ vs SHE, from Table S11) and corrected oxidation potential using the scheme of Matsui et al. \cite{matsuiDensityFunctionalTheory2013} [Eq.~\eqref{eq:matsui}, with the parameters $E_{abs}^0(\text{SHE})$, $f$, and $\mu$ obtained by a least-square procedure], as computed at the $\omega$B97X-D/6-311+G(d) level in water (left) and acetonitrile (right). The dashed line is a linear regression, obtained without the DH correction. }
 	\label{fig:matsui}
 \end{figure}