Documentation update to improve conditions of #5135 for Get-PnPAvailableSensitivityLabel

[jamesaepp]

Type

• Bug Fix
• New Feature
• Sample

Related Issues?

Partially fixes #5135

What is in this Pull Request ?

Documentation improvement. I will note I clarified the type of application permission with (Delegated) and (Application). From a quick search of the existing code/MD files I didn't see an existing convention.

[jamesaepp]

To ensure there's no confusion: I release my contribution to the care of the project maintainers and license it under the same MIT license as the project.

[jamesaepp]

Clearly I'm still new to github issues/PR workflows. The commits in my fork now include a fix for another issue, #5140

[jackpoz]

I would recommend to create a new branch when you work on a fix, so you can work on multiple fixes at the same time in multiple branches.

[jamesaepp]

Maintainers let me know if you want me to take any action to ensure this PR is just solving a single issue and branch everything out correctly.

These are just documentation updates, so stakes are low but I don't want to be a burden either.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances documentation for two cmdlets related to Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels by adding permission requirements and billing information.

• Adds required permissions section to Get-PnPAvailableSensitivityLabel documentation
• Adds billing requirements and related links for Add-PnPFileSensitivityLabel

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
documentation/Get-PnPAvailableSensitivityLabel.md	Adds Required Permissions section documenting both delegated and application permission options
documentation/Add-PnPFileSensitivityLabel.md	Adds Required Billing section explaining API billing requirements and related documentation links

[KoenZomers]

Thanks @jamesaepp for your nice contribution to the documentation!