Skip to content

ci: delete docs-quality workflow - #556

Merged
castrojo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/remove-compliance-theater-ci
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

ci: delete docs-quality workflow#556
castrojo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/remove-compliance-theater-ci

Conversation

@castrojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Problem

docs-quality.yml blocked two PRs this session for skill file frontmatter — zero relationship to the OCI image product.

Root cause (from principal + QA review)

AGENTS.md used identical imperative language for product gates and process conventions. Agents correctly implemented both as exit 1 checks. The spec was wrong, not the agents.

None of the four checks affected the product:

Check Verdict
Skill frontmatter (name/description) Agent memory hygiene — not product
Line count limit (500 lines) Agent cognitive load convention — not product
INDEX.md coverage Agent discoverability — not product
INDEX.md soundness Agent discoverability — not product

What changed

  • docs-quality.yml deleted
  • AGENTS.md + agentic-model.md updated with explicit gate taxonomy (pushed directly to main per doc-only exception): a check earns exit 1 only if failure means a broken image ships
  • Attribution trailer check already removed in PR #555

What stays

The checks that actually protect the product remain untouched: dconf parity, shellcheck on shipped binaries, image ref pinning, submodule cleanliness, pre-commit, just check.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@castrojo, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 39 minutes and 39 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 536960ab-8bba-4fa2-a42d-a366414d831c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0826b5 and 4a59dad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/docs-quality.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/remove-compliance-theater-ci

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

docs/skills/ is agent memory, not product artifacts. None of the four
checks (frontmatter, line count, INDEX coverage, INDEX soundness)
affect the OCI image — they enforce agent self-improvement conventions
that are now explicitly documented as non-CI-gated in AGENTS.md.

Deleting this workflow removes a hard gate that blocked two PRs this
session for trivial doc formatting reasons unrelated to the product.

Assisted-by: claude-sonnet-4-5 via pi
@castrojo
castrojo force-pushed the fix/remove-compliance-theater-ci branch from 3c66230 to 4a59dad Compare June 10, 2026 18:14
@castrojo
castrojo merged commit 76bfaf5 into main Jun 10, 2026
7 checks passed
@castrojo
castrojo deleted the fix/remove-compliance-theater-ci branch June 10, 2026 18:33
@castrojo castrojo added 4-review A pull request is awaiting review. and removed area/ci labels Jul 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

4-review A pull request is awaiting review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant