Skip to content

Fix Sugarscape example compatibility with Mesa 3.0 #131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

suryanshgargbpgc
Copy link

@suryanshgargbpgc suryanshgargbpgc commented Mar 23, 2025

updates the Sugarscape example to work with Mesa 3.0 by addressing several compatibility issues:

  • Fixed model initialization to properly pass seed to Mesa base class
  • Updated agent creation and tracking to use Mesa 3.0's automatic ID assignment
  • Replaced deprecated scheduler methods with direct agent iteration for stability
  • Modified Sugar agent step method to correctly handle cell occupation checks
  • Removed manual agent list management that conflicted with Mesa's built-in tracking

suryanshgargbpgc and others added 2 commits March 24, 2025 01:22
t updates the Sugarscape example to work with Mesa 3.0 by addressing
several compatibility issues:

- Fixed model initialization to properly pass seed to Mesa base class
- Updated agent creation and tracking to use Mesa 3.0's automatic ID assignment
- Replaced deprecated scheduler methods with direct agent iteration for stability
- Modified Sugar agent step method to correctly handle cell occupation checks
- Removed manual agent list management that conflicted with Mesa's built-in tracking
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@622cff6). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #131   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   91.78%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       11           
  Lines           ?     1680           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1542           
  Misses          ?      138           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@suryanshgargbpgc
Copy link
Author

@adamamer20, please have a look if it works fine.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Put >= than the last version of mesa (3.1.4)

Copy link
Author

@suryanshgargbpgc suryanshgargbpgc Mar 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

@adamamer20, I think mesa does not use python 3.11, so instead of just changing mesa ~=3.0.0 to mesa >=3.1.4
i can implement a conditional dependency.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's great practice to test the changes but do not commit this result.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should use pytest for testing purposes.

@suryanshgargbpgc
Copy link
Author

@adamamer20 have a look if its fine now, as I mentioned earlier, I have implemented a conditional dependency instead of putting mesa >= 3.1.4.

Copy link
Member

@adamamer20 adamamer20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new mesa model is not working correctly. You shouldn't save the agents in a custom list, but you should add them to the model


# Process Sugar agents directly
for sugar in self.sugars:
sugar.step()

def run_model(self, step_count=200):
for i in range(step_count):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're not actually adding any agents to the model so everytime you run_model from performance_comparison.py, the number of agents is always 0 and you don't actually do anything.

pyproject.toml Outdated
Comment on lines 91 to 92
"mesa>=3.1.4; python_version >= '3.11'",
"mesa~=3.0.0; python_version < '3.11'",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"mesa>=3.1.4; python_version >= '3.11'",
"mesa~=3.0.0; python_version < '3.11'",
"mesa>=3.1.5",

This wasn't a bad idea but let's just simplify and bump up the version to 3.11

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants