Rename 'agents' property to 'df' for AgentContainer for issue # 68

[reyan-singh]

Changes done in AgentContainer to rename agents as df and change done as required in agents/agentset classes to reflect df in abstract/concrete files

Note: i have depreciated agents to use df instead, to keep it compatible with existing files if any and then good to remove completely once all looks good

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (main@5078421). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
mesa_frames/abstract/agents.py	75.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #148   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   91.72%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       11           
  Lines           ?     1691           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1551           
  Misses          ?      140           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[adamamer20]

Seems a good direction!
However we are still very early in the development phase so we can deprecate without giving notice to users.
Try removing completely the agents property and test if everything (including examples) work correctly

[reyan-singh]

Seems a good direction! However we are still very early in the development phase so we can deprecate without giving notice to users. Try removing completely the agents property and test if everything (including examples) work correctly

removed agents property completely to use df, all tests passed. Boltzmann_wealth is updated and passed. no change found in sugarscape example

[adamamer20]

Alright, before I proceed with my final review, I’d like to tag @Ben-geo to get his thoughts as well. I think this would be a good opportunity for him to test out the review process and share his feedback.

[Ben-geo]

Thanks a lot for the tag, @adamamer20 !

I went through the implementation and didn’t find anything that needs to be changed. Everything looks solid. (Though there's always a chance I might have missed something, first review 😅)

and I was thinking about how will it work after including #146
._agentsets["sheep"].agents["unique_id"] to
._agentsets["sheep"].df["unique_id"]

I like this better but it still does feel like a lot for the end user right? @reyan-singh what do you think??

[reyan-singh]

Thanks a lot for the tag, @adamamer20 !

I went through the implementation and didn’t find anything that needs to be changed. Everything looks solid. (Though there's always a chance I might have missed something, first review 😅)

and I was thinking about how will it work after including #146 ._agentsets["sheep"].agents["unique_id"] to ._agentsets["sheep"].df["unique_id"]

I like this better but it still does feel like a lot for the end user right? @reyan-singh what do you think??

Thanks a lot for the tag, @adamamer20 !

I went through the implementation and didn’t find anything that needs to be changed. Everything looks solid. (Though there's always a chance I might have missed something, first review 😅)

and I was thinking about how will it work after including #146 ._agentsets["sheep"].agents["unique_id"] to ._agentsets["sheep"].df["unique_id"]

I like this better but it still does feel like a lot for the end user right? @reyan-singh what do you think??

Thanks @Ben-geo for review, yes need to use df instead of agents for agentsets, one of the reason is this give clear hint to users its data frame but more then that as described in issue also this new syntax df avoid confusion when used with model and nested agents