Use F36 repos instead of rawhide #2491
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Installing binutils on F36 from the rawhide repos started failing:
Downloading Packages:
(1/8): jansson-2.13.1-9.fc40.x86_64.rpm 97 kB/s | 44 kB 00:00
(2/8): binutils-gold-2.41-32.fc40.x86_64.rpm 1.1 MB/s | 782 kB 00:00
(3/8): glibc-common-2.39-2.fc40.x86_64.rpm 3.5 MB/s | 383 kB 00:00
(4/8): binutils-2.41-32.fc40.x86_64.rpm 6.5 MB/s | 6.2 MB 00:00
(5/8): glibc-2.39-2.fc40.x86_64.rpm 4.2 MB/s | 2.2 MB 00:00
(6/8): glibc-gconv-extra-2.39-2.fc40.x86_64.rpm 7.5 MB/s | 1.7 MB 00:00
(7/8): glibc-langpack-en-2.39-2.fc40.x86_64.rpm 4.3 MB/s | 694 kB 00:00
(8/8): libstdc++-14.0.1-0.6.fc40.x86_64.rpm 3.9 MB/s | 872 kB 00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 6.5 MB/s | 13 MB 00:01
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for t 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00
Importing GPG key 0xEB10B464:
Userid : "Fedora (38) <[email protected]>"
Fingerprint: 6A51 BBAB BA3D 5467 B617 1221 809A 8D7C EB10 B464
From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Key imported successfully
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for t 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00
Importing GPG key 0xA15B79CC:
Userid : "Fedora (40) <[email protected]>"
Fingerprint: 115D F9AE F857 853E E844 5D0A 0727 707E A15B 79CC
From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-40-x86_64
Key imported successfully
Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
Public key for binutils-2.41-32.fc40.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: binutils-2.41-32.fc40.x86_64
GPG Keys are configured as:
file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64,
file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-40-x86_64
We were originally forced to use the rawhide repos to work around a bug in
binutils[1], see c37fc41.
The binutils bug was fixed in binutils-2.37-35.fc36, so drop the rawhide repos
and inherit most of the defaults from vanagon.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2114597
mhashizume
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2024
mhashizume
added
the
maintenance
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Installing binutils on F36 from the rawhide repos started failing:
We were originally forced to use the rawhide repos to work around a bug in binutils[1], see c37fc41.
The binutils bug was fixed in binutils-2.37-35.fc36, so drop the rawhide repos and inherit most of the defaults from vanagon.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2114597