Skip to content

Add MacOS X tests #239

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 26 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Add MacOS X tests #239

wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Aug 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Expanded continuous integration testing to support both macOS and Ubuntu operating systems, enhancing compatibility.
    • Introduced a flexible matrix strategy for Python versions in the testing workflows, allowing for easier updates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved overall robustness of the testing process by ensuring broader coverage across different environments.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the GitHub Actions workflows for running unit tests by introducing a matrix strategy to support multiple operating systems and Python versions. This update allows testing on both macos-latest and ubuntu-latest, ensuring greater compatibility and flexibility in the CI/CD pipeline. The configuration now accommodates all specified Python versions in a more streamlined manner, improving the robustness and coverage of the testing environments.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/unittests-mpich.yml, .github/workflows/unittests-openmpi.yml Introduced a matrix strategy for operating systems and Python versions, allowing builds on macos-latest and ubuntu-latest, enhancing flexibility and coverage. runs-on now uses ${{ matrix.operating-system }}.

Poem

🌟 In fields of code where bunnies play,
We’ve spruced the tests in a grand new way!
Mac and Ubuntu, side by side,
With Python versions, we take great pride.
Hopping through CI, so robust and bright,
Our workflow dances in the morning light! 🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2895e4 and f6197d0.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/unittests-mpich.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/unittests-openmpi.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/unittests-mpich.yml (2)

13-13: LGTM!

The introduction of the matrix strategy for runs-on enhances the flexibility and coverage of the CI/CD pipeline.


16-27: LGTM!

The include matrix for operating systems and Python versions is correctly defined, ensuring comprehensive testing across different environments.

.github/workflows/unittests-openmpi.yml (2)

13-13: LGTM!

The introduction of the matrix strategy for runs-on enhances the flexibility and coverage of the CI/CD pipeline.


16-27: LGTM!

The include matrix for operating systems and Python versions is correctly defined, ensuring comprehensive testing across different environments.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2024 18:47
@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

openmpi 5.0 bug - conda-forge/lammps-feedstock#207

OSError: dlopen(liblammps.dylib, 0x000A): symbol not found in flat namespace '_error_top'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
prterun detected that one or more processes exited with non-zero status,
thus causing the job to be terminated. The first process to do so was:

   Process name: [prterun-Mac-1722615538655-5666@1,1] Exit code:    1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

jan-janssen and others added 6 commits July 17, 2025 15:52
# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/unittests-mpich.yml
#	.github/workflows/unittests-openmpi.yml
#	pylammpsmpi/wrapper/ase.py
#	pylammpsmpi/wrapper/concurrent.py
#	pylammpsmpi/wrapper/extended.py
#	tests/test_ase_interface.py
#	tests/test_executor.py
# Conflicts:
#	tests/test_ase_interface.py
@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2025 14:24
@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 17, 2025 14:26
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.26%. Comparing base (7631d80) to head (b835417).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #239      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.15%   81.26%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         552      555       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          448      451       +3     
  Misses        104      104              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

- conda-forge
dependencies:
- coverage
- lammps =2024.06.27=*_mpi_openmpi_*
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Related to the LAMMPS bug conda-forge/lammps-feedstock#207

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant