Rename docs/paper/codemeta.json to codemeta.json

[jan-janssen]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Standardized formatting in the project metadata file by adding a trailing newline.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e3173e92-a507-4e57-ad6f-41b974ac21e2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c523289 and 6812af6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• codemeta.json

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change adds a trailing newline after the closing brace in codemeta.json. No declarations or JSON content changed.

Changes

Codemeta formatting

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add trailing newline codemeta.json	Adds a newline after the closing JSON brace.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 6812a

This change only relocates the metadata file and normalizes its trailing newline; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title states that docs/paper/codemeta.json was renamed to codemeta.json, but the changeset only adds a trailing newline to codemeta.json.	Update the title to describe the actual change, such as Add trailing newline to codemeta.json, or include the intended file rename in the changeset.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codemeta

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.62%. Comparing base (c523289) to head (6812af6).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #569   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.62%   99.62%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        1069     1069           
=======================================
  Hits         1065     1065           
  Misses          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.