Deriving RollPass and ThreeRollPass from Common Base

[axtimhaus]

As an idea to solve the issues that rose in #241

This is a breaking change, so at least new minor version.
For example the report breaks with this PR, because there is a check for RollPass only, which yields now results in 3RP only sequences.

This would also simplify future intro of multiple rolls as in #104

[ChRen95]

So more or less moved the contents from RollPass to BaseRollPass.
Generally I think it's a good idea and will bring more structure to the codebase.
Also it makes deriving Classes easier.

[RichardPfr]

I believe there are still some places where RollPass needs to be changed to BaseRollPass.
One example i found:

pyroll-core/pyroll/core/roll_pass/hookimpls/deformation_unit.py

Lines 94 to 96 in 77e9eda

	def contact_contour_lines(self: DeformationUnit.Profile):
	if isinstance(self.unit, RollPass):
	rp = self.unit

Or am i understanding this wrong?

[ChRen95]

I believe there are still some places where RollPass needs to be changed to BaseRollPass. One example i found:

pyroll-core/pyroll/core/roll_pass/hookimpls/deformation_unit.py

Lines 94 to 96 in 77e9eda

	def contact_contour_lines(self: DeformationUnit.Profile):
	if isinstance(self.unit, RollPass):
	rp = self.unit

Or am i understanding this wrong?

So you don't have to change all the references from RollPass to BaseRollPass as every RollPass is also a BaseRollPass.
In the case that you mentioned it is no problem. I just noticed, that when running the tests 2 fail to converge.

• test_solve3 -> Seems to be an error in report due to the new Class
• tests/roll_pass/test_roll_pass_profile_locations_disks.py -> I don't understand why this error never appeared before since hook and self don't match

[RichardPfr]

Yes but previously this function was also able to be used by ThreeRollPasses, what is now no longer possible. So from my understanding these general functions should all specify BaseRollPass so that other more specific classes can use them aswell.

PS: I also use this function in the zouhar-package for ThreeRollPasses which is where i noticed that for example.

[ChRen95]

Yes but previously this function was also able to be used by ThreeRollPasses, what is now no longer possible. So from my understanding these general functions should all specify BaseRollPass so that other more specific classes can use them aswell.

PS: I also use this function in the zouhar-package for ThreeRollPasses which is where i noticed that for example.

Your right, I thought the hirachy was still BaseRollPass -> RollPass -> ThreeRollPass but now is BaseRollPass -> RollPass, BaseRollPass -> ThreeRollPass. So you can adjust those and commit.

[axtimhaus]

test_solve3 -> Seems to be an error in report due to the new Class

This is why I said

For example the report breaks with this PR, because there is a check for RollPass only, which yields now results in 3RP only sequences.

@RichardPfr you are right with this hook. But this impl has nevertheless to be implemented on BaseRollPass, and not on DeformationUnit. So then the isinstance check is not necessary

[axtimhaus]

The wrong place of this hook impl made me missing it.

I fixed, moved and simplified it.

@BaseRollPass.Profile.contact_lines
def contact_contour_lines(self: BaseRollPass.Profile):
    rp = self.roll_pass
    return [linemerge(cl.intersection(self.cross_section.exterior)) for cl in rp.contour_lines]

[axtimhaus]

rebase