Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use pnpm to publish instead of lerna #2565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2025

Conversation

cprussin
Copy link
Collaborator

@cprussin cprussin commented Apr 6, 2025

We need to use pnpm publish instead of lerna publish now that we're using catalogs, because pnpm is responsible for resolving the catalogs into real dependencies.

This PR also bumps staking-sdk since the published version currently has unresolved catalog dependencies.

@cprussin cprussin requested review from a team as code owners April 6, 2025 16:12
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 6, 2025 4:21pm
component-library ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 6, 2025 4:21pm
entropy-debugger ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 6, 2025 4:21pm
insights ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 6, 2025 4:21pm
proposals ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 6, 2025 4:21pm
staking ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 6, 2025 4:21pm

We need to use `pnpm publish` instead of `lerna publish` now that we're using
catalogs, because pnpm is responsible for resolving the catalogs into real
dependencies.

This PR also bumps staking-sdk since the published version currently has
unresolved catalog dependencies.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants