-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-130887: remove trailing jump in AArch64 JIT stencils #131042
Open
diegorusso
wants to merge
2
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
diegorusso:remove-jumps-aarch64
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+14
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core_and_Builtins/2025-03-10-12-08-57.gh-issue-130887.f823Ih.rst
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Optimize the AArch64 code generation for the JIT. Patch by Diego Russo |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -209,7 +209,15 @@ def pad(self, alignment: int) -> None: | |
self.disassembly.append(f"{offset:x}: {' '.join(['00'] * padding)}") | ||
self.body.extend([0] * padding) | ||
|
||
def remove_jump(self, *, alignment: int = 1) -> None: | ||
def add_nop(self, alignment: int) -> None: | ||
"""Add a NOP if the offset is not aligned.""" | ||
offset = len(self.body) | ||
nop = b"\x1f\x20\x03\xD5" | ||
if offset % alignment: | ||
self.disassembly.append(f"{offset:x}: d503201f\t\t nop") | ||
self.body.extend(nop) | ||
|
||
def remove_jump(self) -> None: | ||
"""Remove a zero-length continuation jump, if it exists.""" | ||
hole = max(self.holes, key=lambda hole: hole.offset) | ||
match hole: | ||
|
@@ -244,8 +252,9 @@ def remove_jump(self, *, alignment: int = 1) -> None: | |
jump = b"\x00\x00\x00\x14" | ||
case _: | ||
return | ||
if self.body[offset:] == jump and offset % alignment == 0: | ||
if self.body[offset:] == jump: | ||
self.body = self.body[:offset] | ||
self.disassembly = self.disassembly[:-2] | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Eh, I'd leave the disassembly alone. I get what you're doing here, but I'd rather leave it as what the preprocessed stencil used to look like and not try to do anything too clever. |
||
self.holes.remove(hole) | ||
|
||
|
||
|
@@ -289,8 +298,8 @@ def process_relocations( | |
self._trampolines.add(ordinal) | ||
hole.addend = ordinal | ||
hole.symbol = None | ||
self.code.remove_jump(alignment=alignment) | ||
self.code.pad(alignment) | ||
self.code.remove_jump() | ||
self.code.add_nop(alignment=alignment) | ||
self.data.pad(8) | ||
for stencil in [self.code, self.data]: | ||
for hole in stencil.holes: | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like that this is ARM-specific, and only really happens to work because of the current alignment values we chose.
I wonder how messy it would be to make
nop
an attribute of_Target
, and pass it intoprocess_relocations
, which passes it here (sort of likealignment
).I think that we should probably also make this so that it can add several
nop
s if the alignment is larger (such as 16), and fail if this isn't possible (when addingnops
overshoots the intended alignment).