-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PEP 685: Comparison of extra names for optional distribution dependencies #2391
Conversation
I will update the Discussions-To link to a proper one on discuss.python.org once this is passing CI. |
e.g. ``___`` stays the same. | ||
|
||
For pip, its | ||
"extra normalisaton behaviour is quite convoluted and eratic", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"extra normalisaton behaviour is quite convoluted and eratic", | |
"extra normalisaton behaviour is quite convoluted and erratic", |
Specification | ||
============= | ||
|
||
[Describe the syntax and semantics of any new language feature.] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove this line
This applies to the ``Provides-Extra`` field and the ``Provides-Dist`` | ||
field both when specifying extras for a distribution as well as the | ||
``extra`` marker. | ||
This will also help enforce the curren requirement from the core |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will also help enforce the curren requirement from the core | |
This will also help enforce the current requirement from the core |
tool ends up installing distributions that somehow weaken the security | ||
of the system. | ||
This is only hypothetical and if it were to occur it would probably be | ||
more of a security concern for the distributions involved more than |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
more of a security concern for the distributions involved more than | |
more of a security concern for the distributions involved than |
The whole sentence isn't easy to follow though.
No description provided.