Skip to content

feat: Netapp Cinder driver for loading cinder cleanly with minimal cinder conf #1074

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2025

Conversation

nidzrai
Copy link
Contributor

@nidzrai nidzrai commented Jul 15, 2025

Bootstrapping the driver cleanly with our static config, Just enough to start the cinder volume service successfully

This commit adds the initial structure for the NetApp Dynamic Cinder driver

The goal of this change is to ensure that the Cinder service loads without any errors when this driver is enabled, even with minimal configuration.

Key points:

  • Initializes required methods and capabilities expected by Cinder
  • Registers a backend under the dynamic_netapp config group
  • Accepts metadata from volume type extra_specs ( hostname, username, password, protocol etc)
  • Parses these dynamic values to prepare for backend selection
  • [WIP]The NetApp REST client is defined but actual volume provisioning and connection logic (e.g., NVMe subsystem creation) is still pending

@nidzrai nidzrai changed the title PUC-1010: Netapp Cinder driver for loading cinder cleanly with minimal cinder conf feat: Netapp Cinder driver for loading cinder cleanly with minimal cinder conf Jul 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cardoe cardoe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you squash your lint fix commit into your main commit?

@cardoe cardoe added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 90d5e36 Jul 17, 2025
37 checks passed
@cardoe cardoe deleted the PUC-1010 branch July 17, 2025 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants