Skip to content

Automated Resyntax fixes #502

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes #502

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 8 files.

  • Fixed 8 occurrences of map-to-for
  • Fixed 4 occurrences of provide/contract-to-contract-out
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of quasiquote-to-list
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of let-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of make-temporary-directory-migration
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of unless-expression-in-for-loop-to-unless-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of arrow-contract-with-rest-to-arrow-contract-with-ellipses
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of always-throwing-if-to-when

resyntax-ci bot added 9 commits April 30, 2025 00:16
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
This quasiquotation is equialent to a simple `list` call.
The `provide/contract` form is a legacy form made obsolete by `contract-out`.
Use the `#:unless` keyword instead of `unless` to reduce loop body indentation.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
…ellipses`

This `->*` contract can be rewritten using `->` with ellipses.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
Use `make-temporary-directory` to make directories instead of `make-temporary-file`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants