Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating the Running Cloud Functional Tests and adding the Running Non-cloud Functional Tests docs #8069

Closed

Conversation

ytimocin
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Updating the Running Cloud Functional Tests and adding the Running Non-cloud Functional Tests docs

Type of change

  • This pull request is a minor refactor, code cleanup, test improvement, or other maintenance task and doesn't change the functionality of Radius (issue link optional).
    Fixes: #issue_number

Contributor checklist

Please verify that the PR meets the following requirements, where applicable:

  • An overview of proposed schema changes is included in a linked GitHub issue.
  • A design document PR is created in the design-notes repository, if new APIs are being introduced.
  • If applicable, design document has been reviewed and approved by Radius maintainers/approvers.
  • A PR for the samples repository is created, if existing samples are affected by the changes in this PR.
  • A PR for the documentation repository is created, if the changes in this PR affect the documentation or any user facing updates are made.
  • A PR for the recipes repository is created, if existing recipes are affected by the changes in this PR.

…n-cloud Functional Tests docs

Signed-off-by: ytimocin <[email protected]>
@ytimocin ytimocin force-pushed the ytimocin/docs/update-contribute-functional-tests branch from 1cc892d to 916a456 Compare November 19, 2024 17:43
@radius-functional-tests
Copy link

radius-functional-tests bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository radius-project/radius
Commit ref 916a456
Unique ID funce402af0e64
Image tag pr-funce402af0e64
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr: 1.12.0
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-funce402af0e64
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-funce402af0e64
  • dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-funce402af0e64
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-funce402af0e64
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-funce402af0e64
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

Copy link

Unit Tests

    1 files  ±0    286 suites  ±0   5m 15s ⏱️ +2s
3 573 tests +1  3 563 ✅ ±0  9 💤 ±0  1 ❌ +1 
3 572 runs  ±0  3 562 ✅  - 1  9 💤 ±0  1 ❌ +1 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 916a456. ± Comparison against base commit ec57f59.

Copy link
Contributor

@kachawla kachawla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating this. A few suggestions.

Copy link
Contributor

@superbeeny superbeeny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, something that I just went through was referencing how to run the control plane locally and then running the functional tests.

my 2c

@ytimocin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR in favor of this one: #8087.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants