Mike Sync v2 review - #132
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated-Upstream-Mike-Sync: true
Upstream-Risk: low
Summary
No code was recorded because the bounded candidate attempt needs new evidence before it is retried.
Capability classifications
user-safe-error-boundary— Useful, but the metadata-only change spans authentication, API error contracts, logging, and potential sensitive-data disclosure. It requires ROSS-specific security review and cannot be reconstructed from metadata.onboarding-settings-hardening— These fixes depend on PR feat(auth): add Google OAuth onboarding and personalisation open-legal-products/mike#365 and affect authentication, OAuth tokens, migrations, and persisted user settings, all outside low-risk synchronization.opt-in-docx-numbering— Opt-in section numbering could improve letters, but it changes a public tool contract and substantive document-generation behavior; ROSS requires product and architecture approval plus workflow evaluation.oauth-onboarding-personalisation— The capability changes OAuth, onboarding, MFA-adjacent flows, schemas, migrations, personalisation data, dependencies, and deployment configuration. Human security, privacy, and product decisions are required.folder-upload-bulk-actions— Folder uploads and bulk actions are useful, but the implementation changes schemas, APIs, upload concurrency, path handling, and document data boundaries.stoppable-isolated-review-generation— Stopping and isolating review generation changes schemas, APIs, concurrent mutations, and production job behavior; it requires an architecture and operational decision.warning-control-keyboard-focus— ROSS already has an accessible alert structure and native warning actions. The smallest independent adaptation adds visible keyboard focus to its existing close and action controls without importing upstream-only components or dependent table work.governed-unified-workflow-catalogue— ROSS already exposes a unified runtime catalogue through repository-generated Ontario workflows with reviewed-source provenance and fail-closed professional-validation gates. Moving it into the database would add migrations and weaken the deliberate governance seam.Safety
Mike Sync v2 applies at most one low-risk implementation candidate per branch. Exact-head Baseline, bounded repair, review, mergeability, and release controls remain authoritative.