Skip to content

Determine which Resource types are worth implementing #218

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
chocolatkey opened this issue Apr 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Determine which Resource types are worth implementing #218

chocolatkey opened this issue Apr 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@chocolatkey

Comments

@chocolatkey
Copy link
Member

Based on this comment, it's possible that the special Resource types like FallbackResource, SynchronizedResource, BufferingResource that are implemented in the kotlin toolkit are not necessary for the go-toolkit. A re-visitation of currently implemented resource helpers as well as these should be done to determine what's actually useful for the go-toolkit.
@chocolatkey chocolatkey self-assigned this Apr 22, 2025
@chocolatkey chocolatkey mentioned this issue Apr 22, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chocolatkey chocolatkey

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@chocolatkey