Skip to content

DOC-5348 RDI: info about at-least-once delivery and checkpointing #1724

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andy-stark-redis
Copy link
Contributor

@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis commented Jun 19, 2025

DOC-5348

I think the info is OK, but I'll ping Greg for the info from his course if we need more detail here.

@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis requested review from yaronp68 and a team June 19, 2025 15:54
@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis self-assigned this Jun 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis changed the title DOC-5438 RDI: info about at-least-once delivery and checkpointing DOC-5348 RDI: info about at-least-once delivery and checkpointing Jun 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cmilesb cmilesb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one sentence I'd suggest re-writing.

change multiple times is harmless because the multiple writes
are [*idempotent*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence) (that is
to say that all writes after the first one make no change to the
overall state).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd change this sentence to:

"Apart from a slight performance overhead, adding a change multiple times is harmless because all writes after the first one make no change to the overall state."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants